Suppr超能文献

健康之心在中心地带的设计(H3):一项实践随机、比较效果研究。

Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): A practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Center for Health Information Partnerships (CHiP), Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3) study is part of a nationwide effort, EvidenceNOW, seeking to better understand the ability of small primary care practices to improve "ABCS" clinical quality measures: appropriate Aspirin therapy, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation. H3 aimed to assess feasibility of implementing Point-of-Care (POC) or POC plus Population Management (POC + PM) quality improvement (QI) strategies to improve ABCS at practices in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. We describe the design and randomization of the H3 study.

METHODS

We conducted a two-arm (1:1, POC:POC + PM), practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study in 226 primary care practices across four "waves" of randomization with a 12-month intervention period, followed by a six-month sustainability period. Randomization controlled imbalance in nine baseline variables through a modified constrained algorithm. Among others, we used initial, unverified estimates of baseline ABCS values.

RESULTS

We randomized 112 and 114 practices to POC and POC + PM arms, respectively. Randomization ensured baseline comparability for all nine key variables, including the ABCS measures indicating proportion of patients at the practice level meeting each quality measure. Median(Inner Quartile Range) values were A: 0.78(0.66-0.86) in POC arm vs. 0.77(0.63-0.86) in POC + PM arm, B: 0.64(0.53-0.73) vs. 0.64(0.53-0.75), C: 0.78(0.63-0.86) vs. 0.75(0.64-0.81), S: 0.80(0.65-0.81) vs. 0.79(0.61-0.91).

DISCUSSION

Surrogate estimates for the true ABCS at baseline coupled with the unique randomization logic achieved adequate baseline balance on these outcomes. Similar practice- or cluster-randomized trials may consider adaptations of this design. Final analyses on 12- and 18-month ABCS outcomes for the H3 study are forthcoming.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Initial post: 11/05/2015; identifier: NCT02598284; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598284?term=NCT02598284&rank=1).

摘要

背景

“腹地健康心脏(H3)”研究是全国范围内努力的一部分, EvidenceNOW 旨在更好地了解小型初级保健实践改善“ABCS”临床质量指标的能力:适当的阿司匹林治疗、血压控制、胆固醇管理和戒烟。H3 旨在评估在伊利诺伊州、印第安纳州和威斯康星州的实践中实施即时或即时加人群管理(POC+PM)质量改进(QI)策略以改善 ABCS 的可行性。我们描述了 H3 研究的设计和随机分组。

方法

我们进行了一项两臂(1:1,POC:POC+PM)、实践随机、比较有效性研究,在四个“波”的随机分组中进行,干预期为 12 个月,随后是 6 个月的可持续性期。随机分组通过修改后的约束算法控制了 9 个基线变量的不平衡。除其他外,我们使用了初始未经证实的基线 ABCS 值估计值。

结果

我们分别将 112 家和 114 家实践随机分配到 POC 和 POC+PM 组。随机分组确保了所有 9 个关键变量的基线可比性,包括表明实践层面符合每个质量指标的患者比例的 ABCS 指标。中位数(内四分位数范围)值为:A:0.78(0.66-0.86)在 POC 组,0.77(0.63-0.86)在 POC+PM 组,B:0.64(0.53-0.73)在 POC 组,0.64(0.53-0.75)在 POC+PM 组,C:0.78(0.63-0.86)在 POC 组,0.75(0.64-0.81)在 POC+PM 组,S:0.80(0.65-0.81)在 POC 组,0.79(0.61-0.91)在 POC+PM 组。

讨论

基线时 ABCS 的替代估计值加上独特的随机分组逻辑,在这些结果上实现了充分的基线平衡。类似的实践或群组随机试验可能会考虑这种设计的适应性。H3 研究的 12 个月和 18 个月 ABCS 结果的最终分析即将进行。

试验注册

本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(初始发布日期:2015 年 11 月 5 日;标识符:NCT02598284;网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598284?term=NCT02598284&rank=1)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验