Lindner Stephan, Solberg Leif I, Miller William L, Balasubramanian Bijal A, Marino Miguel, McConnell K John, Edwards Samuel T, Stange Kurt C, Springer Rachel J, Cohen Deborah J
From Center for Health Systems Effectiveness & Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, (SL, KJM); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland State University, Portland (SL, MM, KJM); Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL, KJM); HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LIS); Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (WLM); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health in Dallas, Dallas, TX (BAB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, (MM STE, RJS, DJC); Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (STE); Center for Community Health Integration, Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):398-407. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180271.
We assessed differences in structural characteristics, quality improvement processes, and cardiovascular preventive care by ownership type among 989 small to medium primary care practices.
This cross-sectional analysis used electronic health record and survey data collected between September 2015 and April 2017 as part of an evaluation of the EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care Initiative by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. We compared physician-owned practices, health system or medical group practices, and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) by using 15 survey-based practice characteristic measures, 9 survey-based quality improvement process measures, and 4 electronic health record-based cardiovascular disease prevention quality measures, namely, aspirin prescription, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation support (ABCS).
Physician-owned practices were more likely to be solo (45.0% compared with 8.1%, < .001 for health system practices and 12.8%, = .009 for FQHCs) and less likely to have experienced a major change (eg, moved to a new location) in the last year (43.1% vs 65.4%, = .01 and 72.1%, = .001, respectively). FQHCs reported the highest use of quality improvement processes, followed by health system practices. ABCS performance was similar across ownership type, with the exception of smoking cessation support (51.0% for physician-owned practices vs 67.3%, = .004 for health system practices and 69.3%, = .004 for FQHCs).
Primary care practice ownership was associated with differences in quality improvement process measures, with FQHCs reporting the highest use of such quality-improvement strategies. ABCS were mostly unrelated to ownership, suggesting a complex path between quality improvement strategies and outcomes.
我们评估了989家中小型初级保健机构中不同所有制类型在结构特征、质量改进流程和心血管疾病预防保健方面的差异。
这项横断面分析使用了2015年9月至2017年4月期间收集的电子健康记录和调查数据,作为医疗保健研究与质量局开展的“证据NOW:推进初级保健中的心脏健康倡议”评估的一部分。我们通过15项基于调查的机构特征指标、9项基于调查的质量改进流程指标和4项基于电子健康记录的心血管疾病预防质量指标,即阿司匹林处方、血压控制、胆固醇管理和戒烟支持(ABCS),对医生所有制机构、医疗系统或医疗集团机构以及联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)进行了比较。
医生所有制机构更有可能是单人执业(分别为45.0%,而医疗系统机构为8.1%,P<0.001;FQHC为12.8%,P=0.009),并且在过去一年中经历重大变化(如迁至新地点)的可能性较小(分别为43.1%对65.4%,P=0.01;以及72.1%,P=0.001)。FQHC报告的质量改进流程使用率最高,其次是医疗系统机构。除戒烟支持外,ABCS在不同所有制类型中的表现相似(医生所有制机构为51.0%,医疗系统机构为67.3%,P=0.004;FQHC为69.3%,P=0.004)。
初级保健机构的所有制与质量改进流程指标的差异相关,FQHC报告的此类质量改进策略使用率最高。ABCS大多与所有制无关,这表明质量改进策略与结果之间的路径较为复杂。