Center for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Nov;37(11):1007-1014. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00813-1. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Interventions for blood pressure (BP) control have positive effects on outcomes for patients with hypertension. Research on these effects in small- and medium-sized practices is limited. Our retrospective analysis used data from Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3), a research program conducted in 2016-2018 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's EvidenceNOW initiative, to examine the impact of implementing more interventions for BP control in these settings. Thirty-eight H3 practices met inclusion criteria and were assigned to an implementer group (high or low) based on the number of interventions implemented with the support of a practice facilitator during the study. Practices in the high-implementer group implemented a mean of 2.2 additional interventions relative to the low-implementer group. Groups were compared on two measures of BP control: (1) mean percentage of hypertensive patients with a most recent BP below 140/90, and (2) mean systolic and diastolic BP of hypertensive patients. In the first measure, practices in the high-implementer group had greater improvement between baseline and the end of the study. Among the 10,150 patients included in the second measure, reductions in mean SBP and DBP were greater for the high-implementer group. These outcomes show that implementing additional interventions had a positive association with measures of BP control, though clinical significance was unknown or limited. Future research is needed to understand the impact of interventions for BP control in small- and medium-sized practices, including the interactions among intervention implementation, practice facilitation, and practice and patient characteristics.
干预血压(BP)控制对高血压患者的结局有积极影响。关于这些在中小规模实践中的效果的研究是有限的。我们的回顾性分析使用了来自 Heartland 的健康心脏(H3)的数据,这是一项于 2016-2018 年作为医疗保健研究和质量机构的 EvidenceNOW 倡议的一部分进行的研究计划,以研究在这些环境中实施更多血压控制干预措施的影响。38 个 H3 实践符合纳入标准,并根据在研究期间在实践促进者的支持下实施的干预措施数量被分配到实施者组(高或低)。在两种血压控制措施上比较了两组:(1)最近一次血压低于 140/90 的高血压患者的平均百分比,和(2)高血压患者的平均收缩压和舒张压。在第一个措施中,高实施组在基线和研究结束之间有更大的改善。在第二项措施中纳入的 10150 名患者中,高实施组的平均收缩压和舒张压均有降低。这些结果表明,实施更多的干预措施与血压控制措施有积极的关联,尽管临床意义未知或有限。需要进一步研究以了解在中小规模实践中干预血压控制的影响,包括干预实施、实践促进和实践及患者特征之间的相互作用。