Sergeant Joseph, Steinhausen Hans-Christoph
Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, NL-1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zürich, Freiestr. 15, CH-8028, Zürich.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 Jan;1(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02084432.
Differences between, on the one hand, North American and European perspectives on Hyperkinetic Disorder, and, on the other hand, within Europe are noted and discussed in this paper. A dominant European tradition has stressed, since the beginning of this century, the organic involvement in hyperkinetic disorder, whereas the North American tradition has stressed both behavioural and social functioning in hyperactivity (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) and its associated disorder, Conduct Disorder. Five reasons for the difference in prevalence between the two perspectives are discussed: association disorder, decision rules, expression of behaviour, weighting of symptoms, and diagnostic instruments. The review suggests that the differences within Europe in the diagnosis, management, and treatment should be utilized in well-designed collaborative studies to investigate the validity of the different diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The coordination of such studies is seen as the main task of the newly founded European Network on Hyperkinetic Disorder (EUNETHYDIS).
本文指出并讨论了一方面北美和欧洲对多动障碍的看法之间的差异,另一方面欧洲内部看法之间的差异。自本世纪初以来,欧洲的主流传统一直强调多动障碍中的器质性因素,而北美传统则强调多动(注意力缺陷多动障碍)及其相关障碍品行障碍中的行为和社会功能。文中讨论了两种观点在患病率上存在差异的五个原因:关联障碍、决策规则、行为表现、症状权重和诊断工具。该综述表明,欧洲内部在诊断、管理和治疗方面的差异应在精心设计的合作研究中加以利用,以调查不同诊断和治疗程序的有效性。此类研究的协调被视为新成立的欧洲多动障碍网络(EUNETHYDIS)的主要任务。