• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性失语症双重约束诱导语言治疗的反应。

Treatment Response to a Double Administration of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy in Chronic Aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1664-1690. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0102.

DOI:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0102
PMID:29872835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8645245/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated changes in oral-verbal expressive language associated with improvements following 2 treatment periods of constraint-induced language therapy in 4 participants with stroke-induced chronic aphasia. Generalization of treatment to untrained materials and to discourse production was also analyzed, as was the durability of the treatment effect.

METHOD

Participants with aphasia were assessed using standardized measures and discourse tasks at 3 to 4 time points to document behavioral changes throughout each of two 30-hr treatment periods of constraint-induced language therapy. Daily probes of trained and untrained materials were also administered.

RESULTS

Despite participant heterogeneity, behavioral results for each person with aphasia indicated a positive response to treatment following each treatment period indicated by performance on standardized tests, trained materials, or both. Treatment effects generalized to some degree to untrained stimuli and to discourse measures and were generally maintained at follow-up testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Data support the utility of a 2nd treatment period. Results are relevant to rehabilitation in chronic aphasia, confirming that significant language gains continue well past the point of spontaneous recovery and can occur in a relatively short time period. Importantly, changes are not confined to a single treatment period, suggesting that people with aphasia may benefit from multiple doses of high-intensity treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了 4 名脑卒中后慢性失语症患者在接受 2 个疗程的强制性语言治疗后的口语表达语言变化,探讨了治疗对未训练材料和话语生成的泛化,以及治疗效果的持久性。

方法

采用标准化评估和话语任务,在 3 至 4 个时间点对失语症患者进行评估,以记录每个 30 小时强制性语言治疗疗程中的行为变化。还对训练和未训练材料进行了日常探测。

结果

尽管参与者存在异质性,但每位失语症患者的行为结果表明,在每个治疗周期后,他们对治疗有积极的反应,这表现在标准化测试、训练材料或两者上的表现。治疗效果在一定程度上泛化到未训练的刺激物和话语测量上,并且在随访测试中通常保持。

结论

数据支持第二个治疗周期的有效性。结果与慢性失语症的康复相关,证实了显著的语言进步可以持续很长时间,远远超过自发恢复的时间,并且可以在相对较短的时间内发生。重要的是,变化并不局限于单一的治疗周期,这表明失语症患者可能受益于多次高强度治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/221119d63baf/JSLHR-61-1664-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/ddedffe565a8/JSLHR-61-1664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/b9788c063317/JSLHR-61-1664-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/0de7e6126bd3/JSLHR-61-1664-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/53ba96747573/JSLHR-61-1664-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/59bbe449b23f/JSLHR-61-1664-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/c6b27e9469fc/JSLHR-61-1664-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/1ef697529e4f/JSLHR-61-1664-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/92761db4d09c/JSLHR-61-1664-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/221119d63baf/JSLHR-61-1664-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/ddedffe565a8/JSLHR-61-1664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/b9788c063317/JSLHR-61-1664-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/0de7e6126bd3/JSLHR-61-1664-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/53ba96747573/JSLHR-61-1664-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/59bbe449b23f/JSLHR-61-1664-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/c6b27e9469fc/JSLHR-61-1664-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/1ef697529e4f/JSLHR-61-1664-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/92761db4d09c/JSLHR-61-1664-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9143/8645245/221119d63baf/JSLHR-61-1664-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment Response to a Double Administration of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy in Chronic Aphasia.慢性失语症双重约束诱导语言治疗的反应。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jul 13;61(7):1664-1690. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0102.
2
Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation in a Pilot Randomized Trial of Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy.在一项关于强制性失语症治疗的试点随机试验中,中风后失语症康复的神经影像学关联。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jul 18;23:3489-3507. doi: 10.12659/msm.902301.
3
Constraint-induced aphasia therapy following sub-acute stroke: a single-blind, randomised clinical trial of a modified therapy schedule.亚急性期脑卒中后强制性失语症疗法:一种改良疗法方案的单盲、随机临床试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;85(1):51-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304297. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
4
FCET2EC (From controlled experimental trial to = 2 everyday communication): How effective is intensive integrative therapy for stroke-induced chronic aphasia under routine clinical conditions? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.FCET2EC(从对照实验性试验到日常交流):在常规临床条件下,强化综合疗法对中风所致慢性失语症的效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Sep 23;14:308. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-308.
5
Clinical Outcomes Following Language-Specific Attention Treatment Versus Direct Attention Training for Aphasia: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.针对失语症的特定语言注意力治疗与直接注意力训练后的临床结果:一项比较有效性研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2785-2811. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0504. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.自我管理、计算机化的言语和语言治疗用于慢性卒中后失语症患者与常规护理或对照(Big CACTUS):一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):821-833. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30192-9.
7
Effect of type of language therapy on expressive language skills in patients with post-stroke aphasia.语言治疗类型对中风后失语症患者表达性语言技能的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):825-835. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12390. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Efficacy of reading strategies on text-level reading comprehension in people with post-stroke chronic aphasia: A repeated measures study.阅读策略对脑卒中后慢性失语症患者文本层面阅读理解的疗效:一项重复测量研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1066-1089. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12983. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
9
Behavioral and neurophysiologic response to therapy for chronic aphasia.慢性失语症治疗的行为和神经生理反应。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.144.
10
A feasibility study of combined intermittent theta burst stimulation and modified constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia.联合间歇性θ波爆发刺激与改良强制性失语症疗法治疗慢性脑卒中后失语症的可行性研究
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(4):503-518. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180812.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Augmentative and Alternative Communication-Induced Language Recovery in Chronic Aphasia (PAIL-RcA): Theoretical Construct, Method, Protocol, and Treatment Resources.促进慢性失语症中辅助和替代沟通诱导的语言恢复(PAIL-RcA):理论构建、方法、方案及治疗资源
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):989-1004. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00429. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Progress in the clinical application of constraint-induced therapy following stroke since 2014.2014年以来中风后强制性诱导疗法的临床应用进展
Front Neurol. 2023 May 19;14:1170420. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1170420. eCollection 2023.
3
Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia.

本文引用的文献

1
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
2
Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial.强制性诱导失语症疗法治疗慢性中风后失语症:一项随机、盲法、对照试验性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 24;21:2861-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894291.
3
Structure, Processes, and Retrospective Outcomes From an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program.
评估失语症个体交流能力的 CEECCA 问卷的心理测量学测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053935.
4
Dosage Frequency Effects on Treatment Outcomes Following Self-managed Digital Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study.自我管理数字疗法治疗后的剂量频率对治疗结果的影响:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e36135. doi: 10.2196/36135.
5
Individualized response to semantic versus phonological aphasia therapies in stroke.中风患者对语义性失语症与音韵性失语症疗法的个体化反应。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 5;3(3):fcab174. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab174. eCollection 2021.
6
Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Between Semantic and Phonological Regions of Interest May Inform Language Targets in Aphasia.静息态功能磁共振成像中语义和语音感兴趣区域之间的连接性可能为失语症的语言目标提供信息。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Sep 15;63(9):3051-3067. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00117. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
强化综合性失语症项目的结构、流程及回顾性结果
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S854-63. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0164.
4
Sound Production Treatment: Synthesis and Quantification of Outcomes.声音产生治疗:结果的综合与量化
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S798-814. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0127.
5
Constraint-induced aphasia therapy versus intensive semantic treatment in fluent aphasia.流畅性失语症中强制诱导失语症疗法与强化语义治疗的对比
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):281-94. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0018.
6
Reliability and validity of the computerized Revised Token Test: comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia.计算机化修订代币测验的信度和效度:失语症患者与非失语症患者阅读版和听力版的比较
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Apr;58(2):311-24. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0030.
7
Retrospective analysis of outcomes from two intensive comprehensive aphasia programs.对两个强化综合性失语症项目结果的回顾性分析。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):388-97. doi: 10.1310/tsr2005-388.
8
An enhanced protocol for constraint-induced aphasia therapy II: a case series.强制性诱导失语症疗法增强方案 II:病例系列。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;23(1):60-72. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0168).
9
Aphasia treatment: intensity, dose parameters, and script training.失语症治疗:强度、剂量参数和脚本训练。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Oct;14(5):424-31. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.686629. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
A comparison of drill- and communication-based treatment for aphasia.基于训练和交流的失语症治疗方法比较。
Aphasiology. 2011 Nov 18;25(11):1327-1346. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.599364.