• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FCET2EC(从对照实验性试验到日常交流):在常规临床条件下,强化综合疗法对中风所致慢性失语症的效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案

FCET2EC (From controlled experimental trial to = 2 everyday communication): How effective is intensive integrative therapy for stroke-induced chronic aphasia under routine clinical conditions? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Baumgaertner Annette, Grewe Tanja, Ziegler Wolfram, Floel Agnes, Springer Luise, Martus Peter, Breitenstein Caterina

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Alte Rabenstraße 2, 20148 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Sep 23;14:308. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-308.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-14-308
PMID:24059983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3850954/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy guidelines recommend speech and language therapy (SLT) as the "gold standard" for aphasia treatment. Treatment intensity (i.e., ≥5 hours of SLT per week) is a key predictor of SLT outcome. The scientific evidence to support the efficacy of SLT is unsatisfactory to date given the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCT), particularly with respect to chronic aphasia (lasting for >6 months after initial stroke). This randomized waiting list-controlled multi-centre trial examines whether intensive integrative language therapy provided in routine in- and outpatient clinical settings is effective in improving everyday communication in chronic post-stroke aphasia.

METHODS/DESIGN: Participants are men and women aged 18 to 70 years, at least 6 months post an ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke resulting in persisting language impairment (i.e., chronic aphasia); 220 patients will be screened for participation, with the goal of including at least 126 patients during the 26-month recruitment period. Basic language production and comprehension abilities need to be preserved (as assessed by the Aachen Aphasia Test).Therapy consists of language-systematic and communicative-pragmatic exercises for at least 2 hours/day and at least 10 hours/week, plus at least 1 hour self-administered training per day, for at least three weeks. Contents of therapy are adapted to patients' individual impairment profiles.Prior to and immediately following the therapy/waiting period, patients' individual language abilities are assessed via primary and secondary outcome measures. The primary (blinded) outcome measure is the A-scale (informational content, or 'understandability', of the message) of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT), a standardized measure of functional communication ability. Secondary (unblinded) outcome measures are language-systematic and communicative-pragmatic language screenings and questionnaires assessing life quality as viewed by the patient as well as a relative.The primary analysis tests for differences between the therapy group and an untreated (waiting list) control group with respect to pre- versus post 3-week-therapy (or waiting period, respectively) scores on the ANELT A-scale. Statistical between-group comparisons of primary and secondary outcome measures will be conducted in intention-to-treat analyses.Long-term stability of treatment effects will be assessed six months post intensive SLT (primary and secondary endpoints).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier NCT01540383.

摘要

背景

治疗指南推荐言语和语言治疗(SLT)作为失语症治疗的“金标准”。治疗强度(即每周至少5小时的SLT)是SLT治疗效果的关键预测因素。鉴于缺乏随机对照试验(RCT),尤其是关于慢性失语症(首次中风后持续超过6个月)的试验,目前支持SLT疗效的科学证据并不令人满意。这项随机等待列表对照的多中心试验旨在研究在常规门诊和住院临床环境中提供的强化综合语言治疗是否能有效改善慢性中风后失语症患者的日常交流能力。

方法/设计:参与者为年龄在18至70岁之间的男性和女性,在缺血性或出血性中风后至少6个月,导致持续的语言障碍(即慢性失语症);将筛选220名患者参与研究,目标是在26个月的招募期内至少纳入126名患者。基本的语言表达和理解能力需要保留(通过亚琛失语症测试评估)。治疗包括语言系统和交际语用练习,每天至少2小时,每周至少10小时,外加每天至少1小时的自我训练,持续至少三周。治疗内容根据患者的个体损伤情况进行调整。在治疗/等待期之前和之后,通过主要和次要结局指标评估患者的个体语言能力。主要(盲法)结局指标是阿姆斯特丹 - 奈梅亨日常语言测试(ANELT)的A量表(信息内容,即信息的“可理解性”),这是一种功能性沟通能力的标准化测量方法。次要(非盲法)结局指标是语言系统和交际语用语言筛查以及评估患者及其亲属所认为的生活质量的问卷。主要分析测试治疗组和未治疗(等待列表)对照组在治疗前与治疗3周后(或分别为等待期后)ANELT A量表得分之间的差异。将在意向性分析中对主要和次要结局指标进行组间统计学比较。将在强化SLT治疗后6个月评估治疗效果的长期稳定性(主要和次要终点)。

试验注册

在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT01540383。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9426/3850954/60e072ed4f7d/1745-6215-14-308-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9426/3850954/60e072ed4f7d/1745-6215-14-308-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9426/3850954/60e072ed4f7d/1745-6215-14-308-1.jpg

相似文献

1
FCET2EC (From controlled experimental trial to = 2 everyday communication): How effective is intensive integrative therapy for stroke-induced chronic aphasia under routine clinical conditions? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.FCET2EC(从对照实验性试验到日常交流):在常规临床条件下,强化综合疗法对中风所致慢性失语症的效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Sep 23;14:308. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-308.
2
Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting.在脑卒中后慢性失语症患者中进行强化语言治疗:一项在医疗保健环境中进行的随机、开放标签、盲终点、对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1528-1538. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30067-3. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
Telerehabilitation for aphasia - protocol of a pragmatic, exploratory, pilot randomized controlled trial.失语症的远程康复——一项实用、探索性、试点随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Apr 2;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2588-5.
4
Augmentative and alternative communication intervention for in-patient individuals with post-stroke aphasia: study protocol of a parallel-group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.增强和替代沟通干预对卒中后失语症住院患者的影响:一项平行组、实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 24;22(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05799-0.
5
Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial on early speech and language therapy in patients with acute stroke and aphasia.急性中风失语患者早期言语和语言治疗的随机对照试验的设计与方法
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):256-61. doi: 10.1310/tsr1503-256.
6
Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.自我管理、计算机化的言语和语言治疗用于慢性卒中后失语症患者与常规护理或对照(Big CACTUS):一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):821-833. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30192-9.
7
Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke sub-acute aphasia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激治疗中风后亚急性失语症:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Aug 2;17:380. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1505-z.
8
Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis.按患者年龄、性别、失语症严重程度和卒中后时间对失语症进行精准康复?一项基于预设、系统评价的个体参与者数据、网络、亚组荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Dec;17(10):1067-1077. doi: 10.1177/17474930221097477. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Effectiveness of enhanced communication therapy in the first four months after stroke for aphasia and dysarthria: a randomised controlled trial.增强型沟通疗法在中风后四个月内对失语症和构音障碍的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 13;345:e4407. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4407.
10
Efficacy of reading strategies on text-level reading comprehension in people with post-stroke chronic aphasia: A repeated measures study.阅读策略对脑卒中后慢性失语症患者文本层面阅读理解的疗效:一项重复测量研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1066-1089. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12983. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[New aspects of neurorehabilitation: motor and language].[神经康复的新进展:运动与语言]
Nervenarzt. 2016 Dec;87(12):1339-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0239-1.
2
[Aphasia: evidence-based therapy approaches].[失语症:循证治疗方法]
Nervenarzt. 2016 Oct;87(10):1051-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0213-y.
3
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of enhanced communication therapy in the first four months after stroke for aphasia and dysarthria: a randomised controlled trial.增强型沟通疗法在中风后四个月内对失语症和构音障碍的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 13;345:e4407. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4407.
2
Aphasia treatment: intensity, dose parameters, and script training.失语症治疗:强度、剂量参数和脚本训练。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Oct;14(5):424-31. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.686629. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
3
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub3.
4
A randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia.急性失语症中风患者极早期言语和语言治疗的随机对照试验。
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011 Jan-Dec;1(1):66-74. doi: 10.1159/000329835. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
5
Efficacy of early cognitive-linguistic treatment and communicative treatment in aphasia after stroke: a randomised controlled trial (RATS-2).早期认知语言治疗和交际治疗对中风后失语症的疗效:一项随机对照试验(RATS-2)。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;82(4):399-404. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.210559. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
6
Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.失语症言语和非言语交流的测量:情景测试的可靠性、有效性和变化敏感性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):424-35. doi: 10.3109/13682820903111952.
7
Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: the first six months.中风和失语症后的心理困扰:头六个月。
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):181-90. doi: 10.1177/0269215509346090.
8
Stroke rehabilitation: an international perspective.中风康复:国际视角
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):44-56. doi: 10.1310/tsr1601-44.
9
Frequency and prognostic value of cognitive disorders in stroke patients.中风患者认知障碍的发生率及预后价值
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(4):356-63. doi: 10.1159/000162262. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.循证系统评价:治疗强度和强制性语言疗法对脑卒中后失语症患者的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Oct;51(5):1282-99. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0206).