Suppr超能文献

主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分与动静脉内瘘结局:与Charlson合并症指数的比较

Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score and arteriovenous fistula outcome: A comparison with Charlson Comorbidity Index.

作者信息

Spatola Leonardo, Finazzi Silvia, Calvetta Albania, Angelini Claudio, Badalamenti Salvatore

机构信息

1 Humanitas, Clinical and Research Center, Renal and Hemodialysis Unit, Rozzano (MI), Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2019 Jan;20(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/1129729818779550. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: Malnutrition is a well-recognized risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, its role for arteriovenous fistulas outcome has not been exhaustively investigated. Our aim was to point out the impact of Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score as independent predictor of arteriovenous fistulas thrombosis (vascular access thrombosis) and/or significant stenosis (vascular access stenosis). In addition, we compared it with the widespread Charlson Comorbidity Index.

METHODS

: We assessed 57 hemodialysis patients for a 2-year interval and evaluated the incidence of vascular access thrombosis and/or stenosis. Linear regression analysis was used to test the relation of variables with Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score at baseline. Logistic and Cox regression analysis evaluated markers as predictors of both vascular access thrombosis and stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare area under the curve values of Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

: Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were positively related to Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score: B = 0.06 (95% CI = 0.01; 0.11) and B = 0.31 (95% CI = 0.01; 0.63). Higher albumin and normalized protein catabolic rate levels had a protective role against vascular access failure: OR = 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56; 0.81) and OR = 0.46 (95% CI = 0.32; 0.67), respectively. Higher Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index values were significant risk factors: HR = 1.42 (95% CI = 1.04; 1.92) and HR = 1.48 (95% CI = 1.01; 2.17), respectively. Area under the curve of Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score was significantly higher than those of both Charlson Comorbidity Index and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index: 0.70 (95% CI = 0.50; 0.88) versus 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41; 0.80) and 0.55 (95CI% = 0.41; 0.70).

CONCLUSION

: Subjective Global Assessment-Dialysis Malnutrition Score, as well as Charlson Comorbidity Index, are useful tools to predict vascular access failure and should be carefully and periodically evaluated in order to check significant variations that may compromise vascular access survival.

摘要

引言

营养不良是血液透析患者全因死亡率的一个公认风险因素。然而,其对动静脉内瘘结局的作用尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是指出主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分作为动静脉内瘘血栓形成(血管通路血栓形成)和/或严重狭窄(血管通路狭窄)的独立预测因素的影响。此外,我们将其与广泛使用的查尔森合并症指数进行了比较。

方法

我们对57例血液透析患者进行了为期2年的评估,并评估了血管通路血栓形成和/或狭窄的发生率。采用线性回归分析来检验变量与基线时主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分之间的关系。逻辑回归和Cox回归分析评估标志物作为血管通路血栓形成和狭窄的预测因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来比较主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分、查尔森合并症指数和改良查尔森合并症指数的曲线下面积值。

结果

年龄和查尔森合并症指数与主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分呈正相关:B = 0.06(95%置信区间 = 0.01;0.11)和B = 0.31(95%置信区间 = 0.01;0.63)。较高的白蛋白和标准化蛋白分解代谢率水平对血管通路失败具有保护作用:比值比分别为0.67(95%置信区间 = 0.56;0.81)和0.46(95%置信区间 = 0.32;0.67)。较高的主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分和查尔森合并症指数值是显著的风险因素:风险比分别为1.42(95%置信区间 = 1.04;1.92)和1.48(95%置信区间 = 1.01;2.17)。主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分的曲线下面积显著高于查尔森合并症指数和改良查尔森合并症指数:0.70(95%置信区间 = 0.50;0.88),而查尔森合并症指数为0.61(95%置信区间 = 0.41;0.80),改良查尔森合并症指数为0.55(95%置信区间 = 0.41;0.70)。

结论

主观全面评定-透析营养不良评分以及查尔森合并症指数都是预测血管通路失败的有用工具,应仔细并定期进行评估,以检查可能危及血管通路存活的显著变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验