Hunter New England Population Health, Newcastle, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):580-587. doi: 10.1111/dar.12816. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Those involved in organised sport have a high risk of excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm, the implementation of alcohol management practices have been proven to reduce these risks. Measuring alcohol management practice implementation by sporting clubs is impeded by a lack of valid tools. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of online self-report of alcohol-management practices by community football clubs via comparison with observational methods.
A cross-sectional study was undertaken with a sample of community football clubs within Australia. The implementation of 12 alcohol management practices was collected via: (i) an online survey; and (ii) observational audit at a clubs home ground. The prevalence of implementation of alcohol management practices for both data collection methods was calculated as was percent agreement and Kappa/Prevalence Adjusted and Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) statistics.
Data were collected from 58 football clubs. For both assessment methods, implementation prevalence was greater than 80% for 6 of the 12 alcohol management practices. A total of 75% (n = 9) of practices had at least 70% agreement between the online and observation methods of assessment. Kappa/PABAK scores ranged from -0.08 (poor agreement) to 0.97 (almost perfect agreement).
The online survey provided valid measure of assessing some but not all alcohol management practices in community sporting clubs. The validity of the measure may be improved by enhancements to the manner in which the self-report data are collected.
参与有组织运动的人有很高的过度饮酒和与酒精相关的伤害风险，实施酒精管理实践已被证明可以降低这些风险。由于缺乏有效的工具，衡量体育俱乐部的酒精管理实践实施情况受到阻碍。本研究的目的是通过与观察方法进行比较，确定社区足球俱乐部通过在线自我报告实施酒精管理实践的有效性。
本研究采用澳大利亚社区足球俱乐部的横断面研究样本。通过以下两种方式收集 12 项酒精管理实践的实施情况：（i）在线调查；（ii）在俱乐部主场进行观察性审计。计算两种数据收集方法的酒精管理实践实施的流行率，以及百分比一致性和 Kappa/调整后流行率和偏倚调整 Kappa（PABAK）统计。
从 58 个足球俱乐部收集了数据。对于两种评估方法，12 项酒精管理实践中有 6 项的实施流行率均高于 80%。在线和观察评估方法之间有 75%（n=9）的实践具有至少 70%的一致性。Kappa/PABAK 评分范围从 -0.08（一致性差）到 0.97（几乎完美一致）。
在线调查为评估社区体育俱乐部的某些但不是所有酒精管理实践提供了有效的衡量标准。通过改进自我报告数据的收集方式，可以提高该措施的有效性。
