Suppr超能文献

并非所有的乳房植入物都一样:一项长达 13 年的植入物寿命和取出原因的回顾。

Not All Breast Implants Are Equal: A 13-Year Review of Implant Longevity and Reasons for Explantation.

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3):281e-289e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004678.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Augmentation mammaplasty is the most common aesthetic procedure. Textured implants control implant position and have improved capsular contracture rates; however, the impact of texturing on longevity and clinical findings at explantation is unclear.

METHODS

All cases of explantation between January of 2005 and April of 2017 from an aesthetic practice were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, implant characteristics, time to explantation, and clinical presentation and intraoperative findings at explantation were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-nine breast implants were explanted during the study period: 249 saline, 147 smooth gel, 123 Biocell, and 20 other nonaggressively textured breast implants. Average time from placement to explantation was 7.5, 5.6, 4.9, and 4.0 years for saline, other textured, smooth gel, and Biocell implants, respectively (p = 3.25e-08). The percentage of implants removed associated with implant performance failure was 50.3, 57.4, 75.0, and 85.4 percent for smooth gel, saline, other textured, and Biocell implants, respectively (p = 7.25e-09). In addition, 21.1 percent of Biocell implants versus 1.4 percent of all other implants presented with pain (p = 2.71e-15). Forty-five Biocell implants had double capsules; this phenomenon was not observed with any other implant type (p = 5.85e-37). Seven Biocell implants had late seromas, compared to three late seromas with any other implant type (p = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, the authors provide evidence that Biocell implants have the shortest time to explantation and the highest proportion of implants associated with implant performance failure. This information should complement the informed consent process when selecting an appropriate implant.

摘要

背景

隆胸术是最常见的美容手术。纹理植入物可控制植入物的位置,并降低包膜挛缩的发生率;然而,纹理对假体的耐久性和取出时的临床发现的影响尚不清楚。

方法

回顾性分析 2005 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月期间从一家美容诊所取出的所有假体。分析患者的人口统计学特征、假体特征、取出时间以及取出时的临床表现和术中发现。

结果

在研究期间,共取出 539 例乳房假体:249 例盐水假体、147 例光滑凝胶假体、123 例 Biocell 假体和 20 例其他非侵袭性纹理假体。盐水、其他纹理、光滑凝胶和 Biocell 假体从植入到取出的平均时间分别为 7.5、5.6、4.9 和 4.0 年(p=3.25e-08)。与假体性能失败相关的假体取出率分别为 50.3%、57.4%、75.0%和 85.4%,光滑凝胶、盐水、其他纹理和 Biocell 假体(p=7.25e-09)。此外,21.1%的 Biocell 假体出现疼痛,而所有其他假体的疼痛发生率为 1.4%(p=2.71e-15)。45 例 Biocell 假体出现双包膜,而其他任何一种假体类型均未观察到这种现象(p=5.85e-37)。7 例 Biocell 假体出现迟发性血清肿,而任何其他假体类型的迟发性血清肿均为 3 例(p=0.0013)。

结论

作者提供的证据表明,Biocell 假体的取出时间最短,与假体性能失败相关的假体比例最高。这些信息应该补充在选择合适的假体时的知情同意过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验