• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

项目管理和网络治理对初级保健中的组织间协作有贡献吗?一项混合方法研究。

Do project management and network governance contribute to inter-organisational collaboration in primary care? A mixed methods study.

作者信息

Schepman Sanneke, Valentijn Pim, Bruijnzeels Marc, Maaijen Marlies, de Bakker Dinny, Batenburg Ronald, de Bont Antoinette

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3169-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3169-8
PMID:29879971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5992666/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for organisational development in primary care has increased as it is accepted as a means of curbing rising costs and responding to demographic transitions. It is only within such inter-organisational networks that small-scale practices can offer treatment to complex patients and continuity of care. The aim of this paper is to explore, through the experience of professionals and patients, whether, and how, project management and network governance can improve the outcomes of projects which promote inter-organisational collaboration in primary care.

METHODS

This paper describes a study of projects aimed at improving inter-organisational collaboration in Dutch primary care. The projects' success in project management and network governance was monitored by interviewing project leaders and board members on the one hand, and improvement in the collaboration by surveying professionals and patients on the other. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were applied to assess the projects. These were analysed, finally, using multi-level models in order to account for the variation in the projects, professionals and patients.

RESULTS

Successful network governance was associated positively with the professionals' satisfaction with the collaboration; but not with improvements in the quality of care as experienced by patients. Neither patients nor professionals perceived successful project management as associated with the outcomes of the collaboration projects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that network governance in particular makes a difference to the outcomes of inter-organisational collaboration in primary care. However, project management is not a predictor for successful inter-organisational collaboration in primary care.

摘要

背景

随着初级保健被视为控制成本上升和应对人口结构转变的一种方式,对其组织发展的需求也在增加。只有在这样的组织间网络中,小规模的医疗机构才能为复杂患者提供治疗并实现连续护理。本文旨在通过专业人员和患者的经验,探讨项目管理和网络治理是否以及如何能够改善促进初级保健组织间合作的项目成果。

方法

本文描述了一项针对旨在改善荷兰初级保健组织间合作的项目的研究。一方面,通过采访项目负责人和董事会成员来监测项目在项目管理和网络治理方面的成功情况;另一方面,通过对专业人员和患者进行调查来评估合作的改善情况。采用定性和定量方法对项目进行评估。最后,使用多层次模型进行分析,以考虑项目、专业人员和患者之间的差异。

结果

成功的网络治理与专业人员对合作的满意度呈正相关;但与患者所体验到的护理质量改善无关。患者和专业人员均未将成功的项目管理视为与合作项目的成果相关。

结论

本研究表明,特别是网络治理对初级保健组织间合作的成果有影响。然而,项目管理并非初级保健组织间成功合作的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ea/5992666/f6a1a902bbde/12913_2018_3169_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ea/5992666/f6a1a902bbde/12913_2018_3169_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ea/5992666/f6a1a902bbde/12913_2018_3169_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do project management and network governance contribute to inter-organisational collaboration in primary care? A mixed methods study.项目管理和网络治理对初级保健中的组织间协作有贡献吗?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3169-8.
2
Collaboration processes and perceived effectiveness of integrated care projects in primary care: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.基层医疗中综合护理项目的协作过程与感知效果:一项纵向混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 9;15:463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1125-4.
3
Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.初级护理助产实践中的助产士与其他孕产妇护理提供者的合作。
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Collaboration amongst clinical nursing leadership teams: a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study.临床护理领导团队之间的合作:一项混合方法的序列解释性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2015 Nov;23(8):1126-36. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12267. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
5
Combining administrative data feedback, reflection and action planning to engage primary care professionals in quality improvement: qualitative assessment of short term program outcomes.结合行政数据反馈、反思与行动计划,促使基层医疗专业人员参与质量改进:短期项目成果的定性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 18;15:391. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1056-0.
6
Inter-organisational collaboration enabling care delivery in a specialist cancer surgery provider network: A qualitative study.组织间协作使专科癌症手术提供网络中的护理得以交付:一项定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jul;27(3):211-221. doi: 10.1177/13558196211053954. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
7
Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients' care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors.基层医疗中关于患者护理计划的跨专业协作:一项关于影响因素的焦点小组研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May 28;17:58. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0456-5.
8
Setting up improvement projects in small scale primary care practices: feasibility of a model for continuous quality improvement.在小规模基层医疗实践中开展改进项目:持续质量改进模型的可行性
Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.36.
9
Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London Research Network (WeLReN).提高研究能力并将初级保健文化转变为反思性探究实践:西伦敦研究网络(WeLReN)的经验。
J Interprof Care. 2001 May;15(2):133-9. doi: 10.1080/13561820120039865.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting standardized cancer patient pathways as a policy at different organizational levels in the Swedish Health System.在瑞典卫生系统的不同组织层面采用标准化的癌症患者路径作为政策。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Nov 27;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01073-8.
2
An integrative perspective on interorganizational multilevel healthcare networks: a systematic literature review.组织间多层次医疗保健网络的综合视角:系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08314-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Netherlands: Health System Review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Mar;18(2):1-240.
2
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example.在实用随机对照试验中构建和检验中层理论的三个阶段:一个理论与方法的案例
Trials. 2015 Oct 15;16:466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y.
3
Collaboration processes and perceived effectiveness of integrated care projects in primary care: a longitudinal mixed-methods study.基层医疗中综合护理项目的协作过程与感知效果:一项纵向混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 9;15:463. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1125-4.
4
Exploring the success of an integrated primary care partnership: a longitudinal study of collaboration processes.探索综合初级保健伙伴关系的成功:合作过程的纵向研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0634-x.
5
The construction of a decision tool to analyse local demand and local supply for GP care using a synthetic estimation model.利用综合估计模型构建用于分析全科医生护理的本地需求和本地供应的决策工具。
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Oct 27;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-55.
6
Linking research to practice: the organisation and implementation of The Netherlands health and social care improvement programmes.将研究与实践联系起来:荷兰卫生和社会保健改善计划的组织和实施。
Health Policy. 2013 Feb;109(2):175-86. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
7
Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.现实主义随机对照试验:一种评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature.改善医疗保健质量的十大挑战:来自健康基金会项目评估和相关文献的经验教训。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):876-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000760. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
9
QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care.QUALICOPC,一项多国研究,评估初级保健的质量、成本和公平性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Oct 20;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-115.
10
What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature.我们对医疗团队的有效性了解多少?文献综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Jun;63(3):263-300. doi: 10.1177/1077558706287003.