• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级护理助产实践中的助产士与其他孕产妇护理提供者的合作。

Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.

作者信息

Warmelink J Catja, Wiegers Therese A, de Cock T Paul, Klomp Trudy, Hutton Eileen K

机构信息

Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, The Netherlands.

Netherlands institute for health services research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.010
PMID:28926751
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inter-professional collaboration is considered essential in effective maternity care. National projects are being undertaken to enhance inter-professional relationships and improve communication between all maternity care providers in order to improve the quality of maternity care in the Netherlands. However, little is known about primary care midwives' satisfaction with collaboration with other maternity care providers, such as general practitioners, maternity care assistance organisations (MCAO), maternity care assistants (MCA), obstetricians, clinical midwives and paediatricians. More insight is needed into the professional working relations of primary care midwives in the Netherlands before major changes are made OBJECTIVE: To assess how satisfied primary care midwives are with collaboration with other maternity care providers and to assess the relationship between their 'satisfaction with collaboration' and personal and work-related characteristics of the midwives, their attitudes towards their work and collaboration characteristics (accessibility). The aim of this study was to provide insight into the professional working relations of primary care midwives in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Our descriptive cross-sectional study is part of the DELIVER study. Ninety nine midwives completed a written questionnaire in May 2010. A Friedman ANOVA test assessed differences in satisfaction with collaboration with six groups of maternity care providers. Bivariate analyses were carried out to assess the relationship between satisfaction with collaboration and personal and work-related characteristics of the midwives, their attitudes towards their work and collaboration characteristics.

RESULTS

Satisfaction experienced by primary care midwives when collaborating with the different maternity care providers varies within and between primary and secondary/tertiary care. Interactions with non-physicians (clinical midwives and MCA(O)) are ranked consistently higher on satisfaction compared with interactions with physicians (GPs, obstetricians and paediatricians). Midwives with more work experience were more satisfied with their collaboration with GPs. Midwives from the southern region of the Netherlands were more satisfied with collaboration with GPs and obstetricians. Compared to the urban areas, in the rural or mixed areas the midwives were more satisfied regarding their collaboration with MCA(O)s and clinical midwives. Midwives from non-Dutch origin were less satisfied with the collaboration with paediatricians. No relations were found between the overall mean satisfaction of collaboration and work-related and personal characteristics and attitude towards work.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-professionals relations in maternity care in the Netherlands can be enhanced, especially the primary care midwives' interactions with physicians and with maternity care providers in the northern and central part of the Netherlands, and in urban areas. Future exploratory or deductive research may provide additional insight in the collaborative practice in everyday work setting.

摘要

背景

跨专业协作在有效的孕产妇护理中被认为至关重要。荷兰正在开展国家项目以加强跨专业关系,改善所有孕产妇护理提供者之间的沟通,从而提高孕产妇护理质量。然而,对于基层护理助产士与其他孕产妇护理提供者(如全科医生、孕产妇护理协助组织(MCAO)、孕产妇护理助理(MCA)、产科医生、临床助产士和儿科医生)协作的满意度了解甚少。在做出重大改变之前,需要更深入了解荷兰基层护理助产士的专业工作关系。

目的

评估基层护理助产士对与其他孕产妇护理提供者协作的满意度,并评估她们“协作满意度”与助产士个人及工作相关特征、她们对工作的态度以及协作特征(可及性)之间的关系。本研究旨在深入了解荷兰基层护理助产士的专业工作关系。

方法

我们的描述性横断面研究是DELIVER研究的一部分。99名助产士于2010年5月完成了一份书面问卷。采用弗里德曼方差分析检验评估与六组孕产妇护理提供者协作的满意度差异。进行双变量分析以评估协作满意度与助产士个人及工作相关特征、她们对工作的态度以及协作特征之间的关系。

结果

基层护理助产士在与不同孕产妇护理提供者协作时所体验到的满意度在基层护理与二级/三级护理内部及之间存在差异。与非医生(临床助产士和MCA(O))的互动在满意度方面的排名始终高于与医生(全科医生、产科医生和儿科医生)的互动。工作经验更丰富的助产士对与全科医生的协作更满意。荷兰南部地区的助产士对与全科医生和产科医生的协作更满意。与城市地区相比,在农村或混合地区,助产士对与MCA(O)和临床助产士的协作更满意。非荷兰籍的助产士对与儿科医生的协作不太满意。未发现协作的总体平均满意度与工作相关及个人特征以及工作态度之间存在关联。

结论

荷兰孕产妇护理中的跨专业关系可以得到加强,特别是基层护理助产士与医生以及荷兰北部和中部地区及城市地区的孕产妇护理提供者之间的互动。未来的探索性或演绎性研究可能会在日常工作环境中的协作实践方面提供更多见解。

相似文献

1
Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.初级护理助产实践中的助产士与其他孕产妇护理提供者的合作。
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
3
Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives' burnout levels and professional attitudes: A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system.比较承担工作量和不承担工作量的助产士的职业倦怠水平与职业态度:一项针对澳大利亚公立产科系统助产士的全国性横断面调查。
Midwifery. 2018 Aug;63:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.审视与恐惧的故事:澳大利亚助产士对外科产科服务审查的经历、参与诉讼及其对临床实践的影响。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
5
Experienced job autonomy among maternity care professionals in The Netherlands.荷兰产科护理专业人员的工作自主性体验。
Midwifery. 2017 Nov;54:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.加拿大出生地点研究:描述产妇实践和提供者在家分娩的暴露情况。
Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
7
How the past influences interprofessional collaboration between obstetricians and midwives in the Netherlands: Findings from a secondary analysis.过去如何影响荷兰产科医生和助产士之间的跨专业合作:二次分析的结果
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):71-6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1064876. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Are midwives in the Netherlands satisfied with their jobs? A systematic examination of satisfaction levels among hospital and primary-care midwives in the Netherlands.荷兰的助产士对他们的工作满意吗?对荷兰医院和初级保健助产士满意度的系统检查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 13;19(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4454-x.
9
Midwives' and Medical professionals' perspectives of collaborative practice at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Malawi: The discovery phase of an appreciative inquiry project.马拉维伊丽莎白女王中央医院产科助产士与医学专业人员对协作实践的看法:一个积极探询项目的发现阶段
Malawi Med J. 2020 Mar;32(1):13-18. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i1.4.
10
An explorative study of factors contributing to the job satisfaction of primary care midwives.一项关于影响基层护理助产士工作满意度因素的探索性研究。
Midwifery. 2015 Apr;31(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional Collaboration in Obstetric and Midwifery Care-Multigroup Comparison of Midwives' and Physicians' Perspective.产科和助产护理中的跨专业协作——助产士与医生视角的多组比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;13(15):1798. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151798.
2
The DELIVER study; the impact of research capacity building on research, education, and practice in Dutch midwifery.DELIVER 研究:研究能力建设对荷兰助产实践、教育和研究的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 31;18(10):e0287834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287834. eCollection 2023.
3
Continuity and care coordination of primary health care: a scoping review.
初级卫生保健的连续性和护理协调:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09718-8.
4
How Do Midwives View Their Professional Autonomy, Now and in Future?助产士如何看待她们现在及未来的职业自主性?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;11(12):1800. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121800.
5
Assessment of interprofessional obstetric and midwifery care from the midwives' perspective using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS).从中助产士的角度,使用跨专业协作量表(ICS)评估跨专业产科和助产护理。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 22;14:1143110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143110. eCollection 2023.
6
Perceptions and behaviour of pregnant women in socioeconomic deprivation in rural areas. A qualitative study in France.农村社会经济贫困孕妇的认知和行为。法国的一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2255-2263. doi: 10.1111/hex.13472. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
7
Models of Risk Selection in Maternal and Newborn Care: Exploring the Organization of Tasks and Responsibilities of Primary Care Midwives and Obstetricians in Risk Selection across The Netherlands.孕产妇保健中的风险选择模型:探索荷兰初级保健助产士和妇产科医生在风险选择方面的任务和职责组织。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031046.
8
Attitude of nurses and midwives towards collaborative care with physicians in Jimma University medical center, Jimma, South West Ethiopia.护士和助产士对与医生在埃塞俄比亚西南部 Jimma 大学医学中心合作护理的态度。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Dec 2;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00531-6.
9
Inter-professional collaboration of nurses and midwives with physicians and associated factors in Jimma University specialized teaching hospital, Jimma, south West Ethiopia, 2019: cross sectional study.2019年埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马市吉马大学专科医院护士和助产士与医生的跨专业协作及相关因素:横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2020 Apr 26;19:33. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00426-w. eCollection 2020.
10
The quality of maternal-fetal and newborn care services in Jordan: a qualitative focus group study.约旦母婴及新生儿护理服务质量:一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4232-9.