Suppr超能文献

低剂量右美托咪定作为丙泊酚输注辅助药物用于儿童MRI检查:一项双队列研究。

Low-dose dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol infusion for children in MRI: A double-cohort study.

作者信息

Nagoshi Makoto, Reddy Swayta, Bell Marisa, Cresencia Allan, Margolis Rebecca, Wetzel Randall, Ross Patrick

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jul;28(7):639-646. doi: 10.1111/pan.13400. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Propofol is an effective sedative for magnetic resonance imaging. Nevertheless, it may cause hemodynamic and respiratory complications in a dose dependent fashion. We investigated the role of low-dose dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) as an adjuvant to propofol sedation for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. We hypothesized that dexmedetomidine would decrease the propofol dose required, airway complications, and hemodynamic instability.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients' age of 1 month to 20 years. Children were divided into 2 groups; group P received only propofol; group D + P received intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) and propofol.

RESULTS

We reviewed 172 children in P and 129 in D + P (dexmedetomidine dose, median: 0.50 μg/kg (IQR: 0.45-0.62). An additional dexmedetomidine bolus was given to 17 children for sedation lasting longer than 2 hours. Total propofol dose (μg/kg/min) was significantly higher in group P than D + P; 215.0 (182.6-253.8) vs 147.6 (127.5-180.9); Median Diff = -67.8; 95%CI = -80.6, -54.9; P < .0001. There was no difference in recovery time (minutes); P: 28 (17-39) vs D + P: 27 (18-41); Median Diff = -1; 95%CI = -6.0, 4.0; P = .694. The need for airway support was significantly greater in P compared to D + P; 15/172 vs 3/129; OR = 0.25; 95%CI = 0.07 to 0.90; P = .02 (2-sample proportions test). Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in P compared to D + P across time over 60 minutes after induction (coef = -0.06, 95%CI = -0.11, -0.02, P = .004).

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: A low-dose bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) used as an adjuvant can decrease the propofol requirement for children undergoing sedation for magnetic resonance imaging. This may decrease the need for airway support and contribute to improved hemodynamic stability without prolonging recovery time.

摘要

引言

丙泊酚是磁共振成像有效的镇静剂。然而,它可能以剂量依赖的方式引起血流动力学和呼吸并发症。我们研究了低剂量右美托咪定(0.5μg/kg)作为丙泊酚镇静辅助剂用于接受磁共振成像的儿童的作用。我们假设右美托咪定将减少所需的丙泊酚剂量、气道并发症和血流动力学不稳定。

方法

我们对年龄在1个月至20岁的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。儿童被分为2组;P组仅接受丙泊酚;D+P组接受静脉推注右美托咪定(0.5μg/kg)和丙泊酚。

结果

我们审查了P组中的172名儿童和D+P组中的129名儿童(右美托咪定剂量,中位数:0.50μg/kg(IQR:0.45-0.62))。17名儿童因镇静持续时间超过2小时而额外给予了右美托咪定推注。P组的丙泊酚总剂量(μg/kg/分钟)显著高于D+P组;215.0(182.6-253.8)对147.6(127.5-180.9);中位数差异=-67.8;95%CI=-80.6,-54.9;P<.0001。恢复时间(分钟)无差异;P组:28(17-39)对D+P组:27(18-41);中位数差异=-1;95%CI=-6.0,4.0;P=.694。与D+P组相比,P组对气道支持的需求显著更高;15/172对3/129;OR=0.25;95%CI=0.07至0.90;P=.02(双样本比例检验)。诱导后60分钟内,P组的平均动脉压在整个时间段内显著低于D+P组(系数=-0.06,95%CI=-0.11,-0.02,P=.004)。

讨论与结论

低剂量推注右美托咪定(0.5μg/kg)作为辅助剂可减少接受磁共振成像镇静的儿童对丙泊酚的需求。这可能减少对气道支持的需求,并有助于改善血流动力学稳定性,而不会延长恢复时间。

相似文献

1
Low-dose dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol infusion for children in MRI: A double-cohort study.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jul;28(7):639-646. doi: 10.1111/pan.13400. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
5
A comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol for magnetic resonance imaging sleep studies in children.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):745-53. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc506.
6
9
Does dexmedetomidine cause less airway collapse than propofol when used for deep sedation?
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

3
Effective and safe pediatric sedation.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Oct;19(Suppl 1):S36-S48. doi: 10.17085/apm.24046. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Dexmedetomidine reduces propofol-induced hippocampal neuron injury by modulating the miR-377-5p/Arc pathway.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Mar 25;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40360-022-00555-9.
9
Dexmedetomidine: What's New for Pediatrics? A Narrative Review.
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 24;9(9):2724. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092724.
10
Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020 May-Jun;96(3):289-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.08.011. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
6
Is the addition of dexmedetomidine to a ketamine-propofol combination in pediatric cardiac catheterization sedation useful?
Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 Jun;33(5):770-4. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0211-1. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
High-dose dexmedetomidine sedation for pediatric MRI.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Feb;21(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03502.x.
8
Sedation assessment using the Ramsay scale.
Emerg Nurse. 2010 Jun;18(3):18-20. doi: 10.7748/en2010.06.18.3.18.c7825.
9
Incidence and predictors of hypertension during high-dose dexmedetomidine sedation for pediatric MRI.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):516-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03299.x. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
10
Effect of increasing depth of dexmedetomidine anesthesia on upper airway morphology in children.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):506-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03311.x. Epub 2010 Apr 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验