Wu Tianshi David, Eakin Michelle N, Rand Cynthia S, Brigham Emily P, Diette Gregory B, Hansel Nadia N, McCormack Meredith C
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):E7-E16. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000790.
Secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) affects up to half of all children in the United States. Many studies have identified factors associated with in-home SHSe, but few have contrasted these factors between households with and without residential smokers. In the latter case, exposure occurs from only external sources that enter the home, such as visitors or environmental incursion.
Among children with SHSe at home, to examine demographic and psychosocial differences between households with and without residential smokers.
Baseline analysis of an observational cohort.
Baltimore City, Maryland.
A total of 157 children with asthma, aged 5 to 12 years.
At-home airborne nicotine, caregiver-reported depression, asthma-related quality of life, functional social support, and demographics. Univariable comparisons were performed between SHS-exposed households with and without residential smokers. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to examine associations between measured factors and absence of residential smokers.
Children (78.3%) had at-home SHSe. Of these, 40.7% lived in households without residential smokers. Compared with households with residential smokers, these caregivers endorsed stronger beliefs in SHS harms and also worse functional social support and asthma-related stress, despite no differences in asthma morbidity. In adjusted models, SHS-exposed children with caregivers in the lowest tertile of functional social support (adjusted odds ratio, 3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-10.99), asthma-related quality of life (2.90; 1.06-7.95), and those living alone (5.28; 1.26-22.15) had at least twice higher odds of having exclusively external SHSe than the highest tertile (P trends < .05).
In-home SHS exposure remains alarmingly high in urban environments. However, a substantial proportion of this exposure appears to be occurring only from external sources that enter the home. Caregivers in these homes had higher desire but lower agency to avoid SHSe, driven by lack of functional support and physical isolation. Public policies targeting these factors may help remediate exposure in this especially vulnerable population.
在美国,多达一半的儿童会接触二手烟(SHSe)。许多研究已经确定了与家庭内二手烟接触相关的因素,但很少有研究对比有和没有居家吸烟者的家庭之间的这些因素。在后一种情况下,接触仅来自进入家中的外部来源,如访客或环境侵入。
在家庭中接触二手烟的儿童中,研究有和没有居家吸烟者的家庭在人口统计学和心理社会方面的差异。
对一个观察性队列进行基线分析。
马里兰州巴尔的摩市。
总共157名5至12岁的哮喘儿童。
家庭空气中尼古丁含量、照顾者报告的抑郁情况、与哮喘相关的生活质量、功能性社会支持以及人口统计学特征。对有和没有居家吸烟者的二手烟暴露家庭进行单变量比较。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验测量因素与没有居家吸烟者之间的关联。
78.3%的儿童在家中接触二手烟。其中,40.7%生活在没有居家吸烟者的家庭中。与有居家吸烟者的家庭相比,这些照顾者对二手烟危害的信念更强,功能性社会支持和与哮喘相关的压力也更差,尽管哮喘发病率没有差异。在调整模型中,功能性社会支持处于最低三分位数(调整后的优势比,3.50;95%置信区间,1.12 - 10.99)、与哮喘相关的生活质量(2.90;1.06 - 7.95)以及独自生活(5.28;1.26 - 22.15)的二手烟暴露儿童,其仅有外部二手烟接触的几率至少是最高三分位数儿童的两倍(P趋势 < 0.05)。
在城市环境中,家庭内二手烟暴露仍然高得惊人。然而,这种暴露的很大一部分似乎仅来自进入家中的外部来源。由于缺乏功能性支持和身体隔离,这些家庭中的照顾者有更高的意愿但更低的能力来避免二手烟暴露。针对这些因素的公共政策可能有助于改善这一特别脆弱人群的暴露情况。