Department of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Sao Paulo 01302-907, Brazil.
Nutrients. 2018 May 21;10(5):650. doi: 10.3390/nu10050650.
Predictive iron bioavailability (FeBio) methods aimed at evaluating the association between diet and body iron have been proposed, but few studies explored their validity and practical usefulness in epidemiological studies. In this cross-sectional study involving 127 women (18⁻42 years) with presumably steady-state body iron balance, correlations were checked among various FeBio estimates (probabilistic approach and meal-based and diet-based algorithms) and serum ferritin (SF) concentrations. Iron deficiency was defined as SF < 15 µg/L. Pearson correlation, Friedman test, and linear regression were employed. Iron intake and prevalence of iron deficiency were 10.9 mg/day and 12.6%. Algorithm estimates were strongly correlated (0.69≤ r ≥0.85; < 0.001), although diet-based models (8.5⁻8.9%) diverged from meal-based models (11.6⁻12.8%; 0.001). Still, all algorithms underestimated the probabilistic approach (17.2%). No significant association was found between SF and FeBio from Monsen (1978), Reddy (2000), and Armah (2013) algorithms. Nevertheless, there was a 30⁻37% difference in SF concentrations between women stratified at extreme tertiles of FeBio from Hallberg and Hulthén (2000) and Collings’ (2013) models. The results demonstrate discordance of FeBio from probabilistic approach and algorithm methods while suggesting two models with best performances to rank individuals according to their bioavailable iron intakes.
已经提出了预测铁生物利用度(FeBio)的方法,旨在评估饮食与体内铁之间的关系,但很少有研究探讨这些方法在流行病学研究中的有效性和实际用途。在这项涉及 127 名(18-42 岁)体内铁平衡状态稳定的女性的横断面研究中,检查了各种 FeBio 估计值(概率方法和基于膳食和基于饮食的算法)与血清铁蛋白(SF)浓度之间的相关性。铁缺乏定义为 SF<15μg/L。采用 Pearson 相关、Friedman 检验和线性回归。铁摄入量和铁缺乏的患病率分别为 10.9mg/天和 12.6%。算法估计值之间具有很强的相关性(0.69≤r≥0.85;<0.001),尽管基于饮食的模型(8.5-8.9%)与基于膳食的模型(11.6-12.8%;<0.001)存在差异。尽管如此,所有算法都低估了概率方法(17.2%)。SF 与 Monsen(1978)、Reddy(2000)和 Armah(2013)算法的 FeBio 之间未发现显著相关性。然而,在 Hallberg 和 Hulthén(2000)和 Collings'(2013)模型中,FeBio 处于极端三分位的女性之间 SF 浓度存在 30-37%的差异。结果表明,概率方法和算法方法的 FeBio 存在差异,同时建议使用两种模型根据个体的可利用铁摄入量对其进行排名。