The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 8;13(6):e0198545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198545. eCollection 2018.
Laterality can be observed as side biases in locomotory behaviour which, in the horse, manifest inter alia as forelimb preferences, most notably in the gallop. The current study investigated possible leading-leg preferences at the population and individual level in Thoroughbred racehorses (n = 2095) making halt-to-gallop transitions. Videos of flat races in the UK (n = 350) were studied to record, for each horse, the lead-leg preference of the initial stride into gallop from the starting stalls. Races from clockwise (C) and anti-clockwise (AC) tracks were chosen alternately at random to ensure equal representation. Course direction, horse age and sex, position relative to the inside rail and finishing position were also noted. On C courses, the left/right ratio was 1.15, which represents a significant bias to the left (z = -2.29, p = 0.022), while on AC courses it was 0.92 (z = 0.51, p = 0.610). In both course directions, there was no significant difference between winning horses that led with the left leading leg versus the right (C courses, z = -1.32, p = 0.19 and AC courses, z = -0.74, p = 0.46). Of the 2,095 horses studied 51.26% led with their L fore and 48.74% with their R, with no statistically significant difference (z = -1.16, p = 0.25). Therefore, there was no evidence of a population level motor laterality. Additionally, 22 male and 22 female horses were randomly chosen for repeated measures of leading leg preference. A laterality index was calculated for each of the 44 horses studied using the repeated measures: 22 exhibited right laterality (of which two were statistically significant) and 21 exhibited left laterality (eight being statistically significant); one horse was ambilateral. Using these data, left lateralized horses were more strongly lateralized on an individual level than the right lateralized horses (t = 2.28, p = 0.03, DF = 34) and mares were more left lateralized than males (t = 2.4, p = 0.03, DF = 19).
偏侧性可以表现为运动行为中的肢体偏向,在马中,主要表现为前肢偏好,在疾驰中尤为明显。本研究在英国的平地赛(n=350)中选择了顺时针(C)和逆时针(AC)赛道的比赛,以记录每匹马从起跑马厩进入疾驰的初始步幅的领先腿偏好。还记录了比赛方向、马的年龄和性别、相对于内轨的位置以及最终位置。在 C 赛道上,左右比例为 1.15,这代表了明显的左偏(z=-2.29,p=0.022),而在 AC 赛道上,左右比例为 0.92(z=0.51,p=0.610)。在两个赛道方向上,左前腿领先的获胜马与右前腿领先的获胜马之间没有显著差异(C 赛道,z=-1.32,p=0.19;AC 赛道,z=-0.74,p=0.46)。在所研究的 2095 匹马中,51.26%用它们的左前肢领跑,48.74%用它们的右前肢领跑,没有统计学上的显著差异(z=-1.16,p=0.25)。因此,没有证据表明存在群体水平的运动偏侧性。此外,随机选择了 22 匹公马和 22 匹母马进行了重复的领先腿偏好测量。使用重复测量,为 44 匹马中的每一匹计算了一个偏侧性指数:22 匹马表现出右侧偏侧性(其中两个具有统计学意义),21 匹马表现出左侧偏侧性(其中八个具有统计学意义);一匹马是双侧的。使用这些数据,左侧偏侧化的马在个体水平上比右侧偏侧化的马更偏侧化(t=2.28,p=0.03,DF=34),母马比公马更偏左侧化(t=2.4,p=0.03,DF=19)。