Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1160-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
The relative benefits of automated titanium fasteners (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) have not been examined in patients undergoing sternotomy. The aim of this study was to assess the time and cost required for suture fixation with the automated device versus conventional hand tying in sternotomy for mitral or tricuspid ring annuloplasty.
Fifty patients scheduled to undergo primary mitral or tricuspid, or both, ring annuloplasty-based valve repair operation by a single surgeon were randomly assigned to receive either conventional hand-tied knots or automated titanium fasteners, with 25 patients in each group. The primary outcome variable was the time required to affix the annuloplasty device to the valve annulus.
The times taken to affix a mitral annuloplasty band or ring were 6.1 ± 0.9 min for manual tying versus 3.1 ± 0.4 min for automated fasteners (p < 0.0001); when calculated per annuloplasty stitch, the values were 22 ± 2 s versus 12 ± 1.1 s, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding values for tricuspid annuloplasty were 4.2 ± 1.2 min (hand tying) versus 2.2 ± 0.3 min (automated fasteners) (p = 0.0005), and the times for each suture were 20 ± 2.1 s versus 13 ± 2 s, respectively (p = 0.0004). The use of the automated fastener had no significant impact on aortic cross-clamp time or cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Total cost associated with annuloplasty fixation with automated titanium fasteners (device cost in addition to operating room time cost) was significantly higher than with hand tying ($1,190 ± 374 vs $164 ± 60; p < 0.0001).
Using the automated fastener to facilitate annuloplasty fixation through a sternotomy resulted in a small procedural time savings (average of 10 s/stitch) that had no overall impact on cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times but added an average cost of $1,026 to the operation.
在进行胸骨切开术的患者中,尚未检查自动化钛紧固件(LSI Solutions,Victor,NY)的相对益处。本研究的目的是评估使用自动设备进行缝线固定与传统手工结扎在二尖瓣或三尖瓣环瓣环成形术中的时间和成本。
50 名计划由同一位外科医生进行二尖瓣或三尖瓣或两者的环瓣环基于瓣环成形术的瓣膜修复手术的患者被随机分配接受传统手工打结或自动化钛紧固件,每组 25 名患者。主要观察变量是将瓣环成形术装置固定到瓣环所需的时间。
手动结扎二尖瓣环带或环的时间为 6.1 ± 0.9 分钟,而自动化紧固件的时间为 3.1 ± 0.4 分钟(p < 0.0001);按每个瓣环成形术缝合计算,值分别为 22 ± 2 秒和 12 ± 1.1 秒(p < 0.0001)。三尖瓣瓣环成形术的相应值为 4.2 ± 1.2 分钟(手动结扎)和 2.2 ± 0.3 分钟(自动化紧固件)(p = 0.0005),每个缝线的时间分别为 20 ± 2.1 秒和 13 ± 2 秒(p = 0.0004)。使用自动化紧固件对主动脉阻断时间或体外循环持续时间没有显著影响。使用自动化钛紧固件进行瓣环成形术固定相关的总费用(除手术室时间成本外,还包括设备成本)显著高于手工结扎(1190 ± 374 美元与 164 ± 60 美元;p < 0.0001)。
通过胸骨切开术使用自动化紧固件来促进瓣环成形术固定可节省手术时间(平均每缝线 10 秒),对体外循环或主动脉阻断时间没有总体影响,但手术费用增加了 1026 美元。