Naz Anum, Abid Khadijah, Syed Asif Ali, Baig Nabeel Naeem, Umer Muhammad Farooq, Mehdi Hussain
Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi.
College of Physicians & Surgeons Pakistan.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 May;68(5):705-708.
To compare sublay and onlay techniques of ventral hernia repair in terms of postoperative drain removal time and wound infection.
This randomised controlled study was conducted from June to December 2016 at Jinnah Medical and Dental College Hospital, Karachi, and comprised hernia patients who were divided into two equal groups A and B. The former were subjected to onlay technique while the latter underwent sublay technique. Operative repair was performed at least 1 year after the index surgery, as this time was required for scar maturation. Data was analysed using SPSS 23, and mean drain removal time between the groups was compared.
There were 100 patients, with 50(50%) in each of the two groups. Mean age of patients in group A was 40.30±4.52 years while in group B, it was 39.12±4.58 years. The mean drain removal time in group A was 4.40±1.53 days and in group B it was 3.06±0.23 days (p=0.01).The difference in terms of wound infection was also significant (p=0.04).
Sublay hernia repair was found to be a good alternative to onlay repair for treatment of ventral hernia.
比较腹疝修补术中补片置于腹膜前间隙(sublay)和补片置于腹外斜肌腱膜表面(onlay)两种技术在术后引流管拔除时间和伤口感染方面的差异。
本随机对照研究于2016年6月至12月在卡拉奇真纳医学与牙科学院医院进行,纳入的疝患者被分为A、B两组,每组50例。A组采用onlay技术,B组采用sublay技术。手术修复在初次手术后至少1年进行,因为瘢痕成熟需要这段时间。使用SPSS 23软件进行数据分析,比较两组之间的平均引流管拔除时间。
共有100例患者,两组各50例。A组患者的平均年龄为40.30±4.52岁,B组为39.12±4.58岁。A组的平均引流管拔除时间为4.40±1.53天,B组为3.06±0.23天(p = 0.01)。在伤口感染方面差异也具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。
对于腹疝治疗,发现sublay疝修补术是onlay修补术的良好替代方法。