Hassan Farrukh, Gaurav Kumar, Kumar Krishan, Kumar Kamlesh, B Balamurali, N Venkatesh, Mehta Muklesh K, A Praveenkumar
General Surgery, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Community Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Cureus. 2024 May 3;16(5):e59593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59593. eCollection 2024 May.
The most difficult hernia surgery is the repair of the ventral hernia, which is caused by aberrant organ or tissue protrusions through the abdominal wall. Factors like obesity, smoking, and chronic medical conditions contribute to their formation. Surgical strategies have evolved from anatomical repair to mesh hernioplasty, with mesh placement playing a significant role in outcomes. The ideal anatomical location for mesh placement remains debated due to varying results. So, the objective of the study is to compare early postoperative complications, surgical site infection, and incidence of recurrence between sublay and onlay mesh placement repair of incisional hernias of <10 cm in diameter, at a tertiary hospital in Ranchi.
This retrospective comparative study was conducted over a period of January 2022 to January 2024 at the Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranchi, India. During the study period, 96 patients were operated on, and their demographic details, along with their position of mesh placement and postoperative complications (seroma formation, wound infection, postoperative hospital stays, and recurrence), were retrieved from the hospital data. Comparisons between onlay and sublay groups in terms of post-operative complications were made.
Within the study period, a total of 96 patients were operated on for incisional hernia. In this study, 36 (37.5%) were male and 60 (62.5%) were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.6:1. Out of the total number of patients, 56 (58.4%) had a past history of emergency surgery. It was observed that there was a higher incidence of seroma formation in the onlay group compared to the sublay with a statistical significance p-value of 0.027. The incidence of wound infection was found to be statistically significant (p-value = 0.035) between the onlay and sublay groups. In a period of six-month follow-up, three patients of the total study population had an incidence of recurrent incisional hernia, of which two from the onlay group and one from the sublay group were present, and there was no statistical significance (p-value > 0.5).
Based on our retrospective analysis, we can say that there is a lower incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence in sublay repair, along with a shorter postoperative hospital stay, making it a preferred method of repair over onlay.
最困难的疝修补手术是腹疝修补术,腹疝是由异常器官或组织穿过腹壁突出引起的。肥胖、吸烟和慢性疾病等因素会促使其形成。手术策略已从解剖修复发展到补片疝修补术,补片放置对手术效果起着重要作用。由于结果各异,补片放置的理想解剖位置仍存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是比较在印度兰契一家三级医院中,直径小于10厘米的切口疝采用补片下层放置修补术和补片上层放置修补术的术后早期并发症、手术部位感染及复发率。
本回顾性比较研究于2022年1月至2024年1月在印度兰契的拉金德拉医学科学研究所进行。在研究期间,对96例患者进行了手术,并从医院数据中获取了他们的人口统计学详细信息,以及补片放置位置和术后并发症(血清肿形成、伤口感染、术后住院时间和复发情况)。对补片上层放置组和补片下层放置组的术后并发症进行了比较。
在研究期间,共有96例患者接受了切口疝手术。在本研究中,男性36例(37.5%),女性60例(62.5%),男女比例为0.6:1。在所有患者中,56例(58.4%)有急诊手术史。观察到补片上层放置组血清肿形成的发生率高于补片下层放置组,差异具有统计学意义,p值为0.027。补片上层放置组和补片下层放置组之间伤口感染的发生率具有统计学意义(p值 = 0.035)。在六个月的随访期内,整个研究人群中有3例患者发生了切口疝复发,其中补片上层放置组2例,补片下层放置组1例,差异无统计学意义(p值 > 0.5)。
基于我们的回顾性分析,可以说补片下层放置修补术的术后并发症和复发率较低,术后住院时间较短,使其成为比补片上层放置修补术更优选的修补方法。