Suppr超能文献

利用宽带鼓室图鉴别传导性听力损失情况。

Differentiating among conductive hearing loss conditions with wideband tympanometry.

作者信息

Kim So Young, Han Jae Joon, Oh Seung Ha, Lee Jun Ho, Suh Myung-Whan, Kim Me Hee, Park Moo Kyun

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHA University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019 Feb;46(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to investigate whether wideband tympanometry (WBT) can distinguish among various kinds of conductive hearing loss and provide additional information.

METHODS

We recruited normal subjects and patients with conductive hearing loss due to the following reasons: tympanic membrane perforation only, ossicular chain problem only, and one or other of those conditions combined with mastoid problems. Wideband absorbance at ambient pressure, peak pressure, resonance frequency, and averaged tympanogram data were measured by WBT and compared between the normal, tympanic membrane perforation only, ossicular chain problem only, and combined with mastoid problems groups.

RESULTS

The normal subjects showed an average peak pressure of -19.51daPa and an average resonance frequency of 965.94Hz. Tympanic membrane perforation only patients showed a very low peak pressure (-124.93daPa) and resonance frequency (73.12Hz). When patients have ossicular chain problems, they showed slightly low peak pressures (43.08daPa) without changes in the resonance frequency (1024.8Hz). Mastoid problem subjects showed slightly decreased resonance frequencies (787.71Hz). Tympanic membrane perforation subjects showed decreased absorbance at low frequencies and ossicular chain problem subjects showed decreases at high frequencies. When comparing the perforation only and ossicular chain subjects by absorbance at 707Hz, the area under the ROC curve was 0.719 (P<0.022). Mastoid problems subjects showed decreased absorbance at all frequencies.

CONCLUSION

WBT can help to distinguish tympanic membrane perforation only and ossicular chain problem patients. WBT may provide additional information on "combined with mastoid problems" patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨宽带鼓室声导抗测试(WBT)能否区分各种类型的传导性听力损失并提供额外信息。

方法

我们招募了正常受试者以及因以下原因导致传导性听力损失的患者:仅鼓膜穿孔、仅听骨链问题,以及上述一种情况与乳突问题合并存在。通过WBT测量环境压力下的宽带吸收率、峰压、共振频率和平均鼓室图数据,并在正常组、仅鼓膜穿孔组、仅听骨链问题组以及合并乳突问题组之间进行比较。

结果

正常受试者的平均峰压为-19.51daPa,平均共振频率为965.94Hz。仅鼓膜穿孔的患者峰压非常低(-124.93daPa),共振频率也很低(73.12Hz)。有听骨链问题的患者峰压略低(43.08daPa),共振频率无变化(1024.8Hz)。有乳突问题的受试者共振频率略有下降(787.71Hz)。鼓膜穿孔的受试者低频吸收率降低,听骨链问题的受试者高频吸收率降低。在707Hz处通过吸收率比较仅鼓膜穿孔和听骨链问题的受试者时,ROC曲线下面积为0.719(P<0.022)。有乳突问题的受试者在所有频率下吸收率均降低。

结论

WBT有助于区分仅鼓膜穿孔和听骨链问题的患者。WBT可能为“合并乳突问题”的患者提供额外信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验