Giotti A, Luzzi S, Maggi C A, Spagnesi S, Zilletti L
Br J Pharmacol. 1985 Apr;84(4):883-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb17383.x.
The effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration was studied in both in vitro and in vivo preparations of the guinea-pig distal colon. In in vitro preparations GABA (10(-7) - 10(-3) M) elicited a dose-dependent relaxation; a decrease in the spontaneous contractions was sometimes observed. The effect of GABA was mimicked by (-)-baclofen, which gave a dose-response curve overlapping that of GABA, while (+)-baclofen was about one hundred times less potent. The relaxation responses induced by the above drugs were antagonized by 5-aminovaleric acid (5 X 10(-4) M), which did not affect adenosine-induced relaxation, but they were insensitive to bicuculline (10(-5) M) and picrotoxin (10(-5) M). Moreover, they were prevented by tetrodotoxin (6 X 10(-7) M). In hyoscine (10(-7) M)-pretreated preparations, GABA still evoked a small relaxation response (approx. 10% of the maximum) that was bicuculline-sensitive. Desensitization to GABA (10(-5) M) was observed. A specific cross-desensitization occurred between GABA (10(-5) M) and (-)-baclofen (10(-5) M). In in vivo preparations, GABA (10 mumol kg-1) and (-)-baclofen (5 mumol kg-1) produced a dose-related inhibition of basal tone, while (+)-baclofen (5 mumol kg-1) had much less effect (about 25%). A decrease in the spontaneous contractions was sometimes observed. The relaxant effect of GABA and (-)-baclofen persisted in guinea-pigs pretreated (1-2 min) with picrotoxin (1.6 mumol kg-1), whereas it was significantly reduced in animals injected 1 min beforehand with 5-aminovaleric acid (0.2 mmol). The maximal relaxant effect induced by GABA and (-)-baclofen did not differ from that of atropine (0.9 mumol kg-1) and after atropine administration GABA had no further inhibitory effect. Relaxation responses induced by GABA and (-)-baclofen still occurred after blockade of nicotinic receptors by hexamethonium (0.17 mmol kg-1), which itself caused an increase in the basal tone. When the tone was increased by topical application of physostigmine (40 micrograms), GABA and (-)-baclofen induced a greater relaxation than that obtained in basal conditions. It is concluded that GABA, both in vitro and in vivo administration, inhibits cholinergic tone in guinea-pig distal colon and that this effect is mediated mainly by activation of GABAB receptors. Further experiments are required to ascertain the possible physiological role of a GABA-releasing neuronal system in the colon in vivo.
在豚鼠远端结肠的体外和体内实验制剂中研究了γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)给药的效果。在体外实验制剂中,GABA(10⁻⁷ - 10⁻³ M)引起剂量依赖性舒张;有时可观察到自发收缩减少。(-)-巴氯芬可模拟GABA的作用,其剂量反应曲线与GABA的重叠,而(+)-巴氯芬的效力约低100倍。上述药物诱导的舒张反应被5-氨基戊酸(5×10⁻⁴ M)拮抗,5-氨基戊酸不影响腺苷诱导的舒张,但对荷包牡丹碱(10⁻⁵ M)和印防己毒素(10⁻⁵ M)不敏感。此外,它们被河豚毒素(6×10⁻⁷ M)阻断。在预先用东莨菪碱(10⁻⁷ M)处理的制剂中,GABA仍能引起较小的舒张反应(约为最大值的10%),该反应对荷包牡丹碱敏感。观察到对GABA(10⁻⁵ M)脱敏。在GABA(10⁻⁵ M)和(-)-巴氯芬(10⁻⁵ M)之间发生特异性交叉脱敏。在体内实验制剂中,GABA(10 μmol kg⁻¹)和(-)-巴氯芬(5 μmol kg⁻¹)产生与剂量相关的基础张力抑制,而(+)-巴氯芬(5 μmol kg⁻¹)的作用小得多(约25%)。有时可观察到自发收缩减少。GABA和(-)-巴氯芬的舒张作用在预先用印防己毒素(1.6 μmol kg⁻¹)处理(1 - 2分钟)的豚鼠中持续存在,而在预先1分钟注射5-氨基戊酸(0.2 mmol)的动物中显著降低。GABA和(-)-巴氯芬诱导的最大舒张作用与阿托品(0.9 μmol kg⁻¹)的无差异,且在给予阿托品后GABA无进一步抑制作用。在六甲铵(0.17 mmol kg⁻¹)阻断烟碱受体后,GABA和(-)-巴氯芬仍能诱导舒张反应,六甲铵本身可引起基础张力增加。当通过局部应用毒扁豆碱(40 μg)使张力增加时,GABA和(-)-巴氯芬诱导的舒张作用比基础条件下更大。结论是,无论是体外还是体内给药,GABA均抑制豚鼠远端结肠的胆碱能张力,且该作用主要通过激活GABAB受体介导。需要进一步实验来确定体内结肠中释放GABA的神经元系统可能的生理作用。