• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单一支付方体系下糖尿病患者药物记录共享计划的影响:查询率的作用。

The impact of a medication record sharing program among diabetes patients under a single-payer system: The role of inquiry rate.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Medical Review and Pharmaceutical Benefits Division, National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.

Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.004
PMID:29887231
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Taiwan's single health insurer introduced a medication record exchange platform, the PharmaCloud program, in 2013. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the medication record inquiry rate on medication duplication among patients with diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective pre-post design with a comparison group was conducted using nationwide health insurance claim data of diabetic patients from 2013 to 2014. Patients whose medication record inquiry rate fell within the upper 25th percentile were classified as the high-inquiry group, and the others as the low-inquiry group. The dependent variables were the likelihood of receiving duplicated medication and the overlapped medication days of the study subjects. Generalized estimation equations with difference-in-difference analysis were calculated to examine the net effect of the PharmaCloud inquiry rate for a matched sub-sample.

RESULTS

In total, 106,508 patients with diabetes were randomly selected. From 2013 to 2014, the medication duplication rate was reduced 7.76 percentile (54.12%-46.36%) for the high-inquiry group and 9.58 percentile (63.72%-54.14%) for the low-inquiry group; the average medication overlap periods were shortened 4.36 days (8.49-4.13) and 6.29 days (11.28-4.99), respectively. The regression models showed patients in the high-inquiry group were more likely to receive duplicated medication (OR = 1.11, 95% C.I. = 1.07-1.16) and with longer overlapped days (7.53%, P = 0.0081) after the program.

CONCLUSION

The medication record sharing program has reduced medication duplication among diabetes patients. However, higher inquiry rate did not lead to greater reduction in medication duplication; the overall effect might be due to enhanced internal control via prescription alert system in hospitals rather physician's review of the records.

摘要

目的

台湾的单一健康保险公司于 2013 年推出了 PharmaCloud 药物记录交换平台。本研究旨在评估药物记录查询率对糖尿病患者药物重复使用的影响。

材料与方法

使用 2013 年至 2014 年全国健康保险理赔数据,采用回顾性前后设计和对照组进行研究。将药物记录查询率处于前 25%分位的患者分为高查询组,其余患者分为低查询组。将研究对象接受重复用药的可能性和重叠用药天数作为因变量。采用广义估计方程和差异分析计算差分式分析来检验 PharmaCloud 查询率对匹配亚组的净效应。

结果

共随机选择了 106508 名糖尿病患者。从 2013 年到 2014 年,高查询组的药物重复率降低了 7.76 个百分点(54.12%-46.36%),低查询组降低了 9.58 个百分点(63.72%-54.14%);平均药物重叠期分别缩短了 4.36 天(8.49-4.13)和 6.29 天(11.28-4.99)。回归模型显示,高查询组的患者更有可能接受重复用药(OR=1.11,95%CI=1.07-1.16),并且用药重叠天数更长(7.53%,P=0.0081)。

结论

药物记录共享计划减少了糖尿病患者的药物重复使用。然而,较高的查询率并没有导致药物重复使用的减少更多;总体效果可能是由于医院处方警报系统加强了内部控制,而不是医生对记录的审查。

相似文献

1
The impact of a medication record sharing program among diabetes patients under a single-payer system: The role of inquiry rate.单一支付方体系下糖尿病患者药物记录共享计划的影响:查询率的作用。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 19.
2
The Impact of a National Health Information Exchange Program Under a Single-payer System.单一支付方体系下国家卫生信息交换计划的影响。
Med Care. 2020 Jan;58(1):90-97. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001227.
3
NHI-PharmaCloud in Taiwan--A preliminary evaluation using the RE-AIM framework and lessons learned.台湾的全民健康保险云端药事服务平台——使用RE-AIM框架的初步评估及经验教训
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):817-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
4
Improving medication safety by cloud technology: Progression and value-added applications in Taiwan.利用云技术提高药物安全性:台湾的进展和增值应用。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
An Investigation of Pharmacists' Acceptance of NHI-PharmaCloud in Taiwan.台湾地区药剂师对健保署药历云端查询系统接受度之调查。
J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 28;42(11):213. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1017-3.
6
Building a national electronic medical record exchange system - experiences in Taiwan.建立全国性电子病历交换系统:台湾的经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Aug;121(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Assessing the effect of Taiwan's outpatient prescription drug copayment policy in the elderly.评估台湾门诊处方药共付政策对老年人的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1331-42. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100579.91550.C4.
8
Preliminary physician and pharmacist survey of the National Health Insurance PharmaCloud system in Taiwan.台湾全民健康保险药云系统的医师与药剂师初步调查。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Oct;149:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
The effect of medication therapy management service combined with a national PharmaCloud system for polypharmacy patients.药物治疗管理服务联合国家药物云系统对多重用药患者的影响。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Oct;134:109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
10
Is diabetes mellitus associated with clinical outcomes in aging males treated with transurethral resection of prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: implications from Taiwan Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.糖尿病与因膀胱出口梗阻接受经尿道前列腺切除术的老年男性的临床结局是否相关:来自台湾全国性人群队列研究的启示
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Mar 16;12:535-541. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S126207. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Information Technology and Doctor Shopping: A Systematic Review.健康信息技术与“医生购物”:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 28;8(3):306. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030306.