Jemes Campaña Inmaculada Concepción, Romero-Galisteo Rita Pilar, Labajos Manzanares María Teresa, Moreno Morales Noelia
Universidad de Málaga, Escuela de Doctorado de la Universidad de Málaga, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Málaga, España.
Universidad de Málaga, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Málaga, España.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 May;90(5):301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Early Intervention (EI), as a paediatric service, has the duty of quantifying the results and the quality of its services provided. The accessibility of valid and reliable tools allows professionals to evaluate the quality of these services.
The aim of this study is to review the scientific literature on tools used to measure the methodological and service quality in EI.
A search was made in different databases: Medline (from PubMed), Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus, ERIC and Scielo. The methodological quality of the studies was tested using the COSMIN scale.
A total of 13 manuscripts met the criteria to be included in this review. Ten of them received a "good" or "reasonable" score based on the COSMIN scale.
Despite its importance, there is no consensus among authors on the measurement of service quality in EI. It is often the family of the children attended in EI that are considered the target to study, although the opinion of professionals carries more weight and completes the information.
早期干预（EI）作为一项儿科服务，有责任对其提供的服务结果和质量进行量化。有效且可靠工具的可及性使专业人员能够评估这些服务的质量。
本研究的目的是回顾关于用于衡量早期干预中方法学和服务质量的工具的科学文献。
在不同数据库进行检索：医学文献数据库（来自PubMed）、科学引文索引数据库、心理学文摘数据库、考科蓝图书馆、Scopus数据库、教育资源信息中心数据库和科学电子图书馆在线数据库。使用COSMIN量表对研究的方法学质量进行检验。
共有13篇手稿符合纳入本综述的标准。其中10篇根据COSMIN量表获得了“良好”或“合理”的评分。
尽管其很重要，但作者们在早期干预服务质量的衡量方面尚未达成共识。通常将接受早期干预服务的儿童家庭视为研究对象，不过专业人员的意见更具分量并能完善信息。
Zotero 插件