Department of Management of Agricultural, Food and Forestry System, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Department of NEUROFARBA, Division of Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Sciences, Florence, Italy.
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jan 15;99(1):391-399. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9200. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
Each region of the world has its own methods, protocols, instruments and procedures regarding how to brew coffee. The final result in the cup is strongly affected by the extraction method, and many studies have focused on this subject. However, few studies have investigated slow, cold extraction methods, despite their popularity among baristas. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize and compare two cold extraction methods: cold brew and cold drip.
Physical and chemical analyses were used to describe coffee beverages in terms of pH, total solids, refractive index, density and viscosity. Caffeine and cinnamic acids were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/diode array detector and HPLC/mass spectrometry. A sensory evaluation included aroma, flavor and textural attributes.
Significant differences were found in the chemical and physical parameters, both between and within the two methods, as a function of the extraction temperature and contact time. Similarly, the sensory evaluation found differences in flavor profiles, as measured in terms of bitterness, sweetness, sourness and global intensity. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
世界上每个地区都有自己的煮咖啡方法、协议、仪器和程序。最终的杯测结果受到萃取方法的强烈影响,因此许多研究都集中在这个主题上。然而,尽管冷萃咖啡在咖啡师中很受欢迎,但很少有研究调查缓慢、低温萃取方法。因此,本研究旨在对两种冷萃方法(冷泡和冷滴滤)进行描述和比较。
物理和化学分析用于描述 pH 值、总固体、折射率、密度和粘度方面的咖啡饮料。采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)/二极管阵列检测器和 HPLC/质谱法定量咖啡因和肉桂酸。感官评估包括香气、风味和口感属性。
萃取温度和接触时间对两种方法的化学和物理参数都有显著影响,并且在两种方法之间和之内都存在差异。同样,风味特征的感官评估也发现了差异,苦味、甜度、酸度和整体强度都有差异。 © 2018 化学工业协会。