UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Nov;23(4):908-932. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12323. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
To investigate physiotherapist's (PTs) fidelity to 31 protocol-listed behaviour change techniques (BCTs) during a group-based self-management intervention. This study also explored the PTs delivery of these BCTs beyond the present or absent dichotomy, using a third variable, partial delivery (i.e., attempted).
Assessment of the intervention arm of the Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills (SOLAS) cluster, randomized controlled feasibility trial, using quantitative methods.
Eight PTs delivered six SOLAS classes each, of which 50% were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were coded by two raters using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 and an intervention-specific manual and assessed for the delivery (i.e., full, partial, or absent) of the 31 BCTs and their target behaviours. Fidelity was calculated as fully delivered BCTs listed as a percentage of those due to take place within each class.
Physiotherapists delivered a mean 20.5 BCTs per class (68.3%; range = 64.9-72.4%). Of these, 17 BCTs were fully delivered in each class representing moderate fidelity to the protocol (56.8%; range = 53.5-59.3%). A further 3.5 BCTs per class (11.5%; range = 8.7-14.8%) were partially delivered. BCTs associated with 'goals and planning' were often poorly delivered.
Delivering the SOLAS intervention BCTs with high fidelity was not feasible. The assessment of partial delivery of BCTs provided greater insight into the techniques that should be removed from the protocol or that may require further training. Complex interventions should consider a list of 'core' or mandatory BCTs alongside 'optional' BCTs, depending on the target behaviour, and the needs of individual participants. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? BCTs are the smallest active components of behavioural interventions, yet typically their effectiveness is determined through meta-analyses. Attempted delivery of BCTs is often unaccounted for yet may provide valuable insight into difficulty with delivery. There is a need to investigate BCT implementation beyond simple presence/absence to identify protocol refinements or required BCT training. What does this study add? BCT delivery was assessed in greater depth than previous research, including partial delivery. Highlights the need for appropriate training in BCTs that are difficult to deliver, particularly those associated with 'goals and planning' Highlights the need for intervention-specific criteria as to what constitutes 'high', 'moderate', and 'low' fidelity.
调查物理治疗师(PTs)在基于小组的自我管理干预中对 31 项议定书列出的行为改变技术(BCTs)的保真度。本研究还使用第三个变量(部分交付,即尝试)探索了 PTs 对这些 BCTs 的交付方式超出了当前或不存在的二分法。
使用定量方法评估自我管理关节炎和腰痛的 SOLAS 组(Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills)的干预臂,这是一项随机对照可行性试验。
8 名 PT 各教授 6 节 SOLAS 课程,其中 50%的课程进行了录音和转录。两名评分员使用行为改变技术分类学 v1 和特定于干预的手册对转录本进行编码,并评估 31 项 BCT 及其目标行为的交付情况(即完整、部分或不存在)。保真度计算为每个类中应发生的完整交付 BCT 百分比。
PT 平均每节课教授 20.5 项 BCT(68.3%;范围为 64.9-72.4%)。其中,每节课有 17 项 BCT 被完整教授,代表对方案的中等保真度(56.8%;范围为 53.5-59.3%)。每节课还有 3.5 项 BCT 部分教授(11.5%;范围为 8.7-14.8%)。与“目标和计划”相关的 BCT 通常交付效果不佳。
高保真地提供 SOLAS 干预 BCT 是不可行的。对 BCT 部分交付的评估提供了更多关于应从方案中删除或可能需要进一步培训的技术的见解。复杂的干预措施应根据目标行为和参与者的需求,考虑一组“核心”或强制性 BCT 以及“可选”BCT。
关于这个主题,目前已经知道了什么?BCT 是行为干预中最小的活性成分,但通常通过荟萃分析来确定其有效性。尝试交付 BCT 通常未被考虑,但可能提供有关交付困难的有价值的见解。需要调查 BCT 的实施情况,不仅限于简单的存在/不存在,以确定方案的改进或所需的 BCT 培训。
这项研究增加了什么?BCT 的交付情况比以前的研究进行了更深入的评估,包括部分交付。突出了在难以交付的 BCT 方面进行适当培训的必要性,特别是那些与“目标和计划”相关的 BCT。突出了需要干预特定的标准,以确定什么是“高”、“中”和“低”保真度。