Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
The University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Addiction. 2020 Feb;115(2):368-380. doi: 10.1111/add.14804. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
Behavioural support increases smoking cessation in clinical settings, but effect sizes differ among providers, due possibly to variations in delivery. This study evaluates a measure ('fidelity index') intended to capture fidelity to delivery of content- and interaction-based items of a behavioural support (BS) for smoking cessation and the association of fidelity with quit rates.
A fidelity index for scoring the adherence and quality domains of a specific BS intervention, '5As for quit', was developed by classifying the intervention components using the taxonomy of behaviour change techniques. The index was applied to code 154 BS sessions audiotaped among 18 chest clinics in Pakistan to assess their fidelity and explore reliability of coding. The association between intervention fidelity and successful quit achieved by the same providers in a previous study was explored using regression analysis.
The index represented two domains: adherence to delivery of content-based activities of 5As (37 items) and quality of interaction-based activities (eight items). The intercoder reliability was good for content-based (average Krippendorff's α = 0.80) and moderate for interaction-based (average Krippendorff's α = 0.66) items. Approximately 70% (intraclass correlation coefficient: adherence scores = 0.72, quality scores = 0.71) of variation in BS delivery was contributed by providers, which increased to 97% (g-coefficient: adherence scores = 0.973, quality scores = 0.974) after accounting for other sources of variation. Higher quit rates were positively associated with average quality scores [risk ratio = 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-3.24], but negatively associated with average adherence scores (risk ratio = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.40-0.77) within services.
The fidelity index is a reliable measure for quantifying intervention fidelity of delivering smoking cessation behavioural support. Recommended revisions of the fidelity index include incorporation of additional interaction-based items, such as the relational techniques used in motivational interviewing.
行为支持可提高临床环境中的戒烟率,但由于提供方式的差异,不同提供者之间的效果大小有所不同。本研究评估了一种衡量标准(“保真度指数”),旨在捕捉对基于内容和交互的行为支持(BS)戒烟的内容和交互项目的交付的保真度,以及保真度与戒烟率的关联。
通过使用行为改变技术分类学对干预组件进行分类,开发了一种用于评分特定 BS 干预“5A 戒烟”的依从性和质量领域的保真度指数。该指数应用于在巴基斯坦的 18 个胸科诊所录制的 154 次 BS 会话中,以评估其保真度并探索编码的可靠性。使用回归分析探讨了先前研究中同一提供者的干预保真度与成功戒烟之间的关联。
该指数代表两个领域:对 5A 内容活动的交付的依从性(37 个项目)和基于交互的活动的质量(8 个项目)。基于内容的项目的编码者间可靠性良好(平均克里普诺德夫 α=0.80),基于交互的项目的可靠性中等(平均克里普诺德夫 α=0.66)。BS 交付方面约 70%(组内相关系数:依从性评分=0.72,质量评分=0.71)的差异归因于提供者,而在考虑到其他来源的差异后,这一比例增加到 97%(g 系数:依从性评分=0.973,质量评分=0.974)。较高的戒烟率与平均质量评分呈正相关[风险比=2.15;95%置信区间(CI)=1.43-3.24],但与服务内的平均依从性评分呈负相关(风险比=0.55;95%CI=0.40-0.77)。
保真度指数是一种可靠的衡量标准,可用于量化提供戒烟行为支持的干预保真度。建议对保真度指数进行修订,包括纳入更多基于交互的项目,例如在动机访谈中使用的关系技术。