• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工耳蜗植入床准备及固定技术对再次人工耳蜗植入率的影响。

The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.

作者信息

Pamuk A E, Pamuk G, Jafarov S, Bajin M D, Saraç S, Sennaroğlu L

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology,Akyurt State Hospital,Ankara,Turkey.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology,Faculty of Medicine,Hacettepe University,Ankara,Turkey.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Jun;132(6):534-539. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118000609. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1017/S0022215118000609
PMID:29888692
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect of the subperiosteal tight pocket technique versus the bone recess with suture fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate and complications.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1514 patients who underwent cochlear implantation by 2 senior surgeons between October 2002 and January 2016. Revision cases were identified and analysed.

RESULTS

In all, 52 patients (3.34 per cent) underwent revision cochlear implantation. The revision rate was 7.18 per cent in the subperiosteal tight pocket group versus 2.37 per cent in the bone recess with suture fixation group (p < 0.001). Device failure was the most common reason for revision surgery in both groups. There was a significant difference in the device failure rate between the bone recess with suture fixation group (2.11 per cent) and subperiosteal tight pocket group (6.88 per cent) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Accurate fixation of the cochlear implant receiver/stimulator is crucial for successful cochlear implantation. As the bone recess with suture fixation technique is associated with a lower revision rate and a similar complication rate as the subperiosteal tight pocket technique, it should be the preferred fixation technique for cochlear implantation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定骨膜下紧密口袋技术与骨槽缝合法对人工耳蜗植入翻修率及并发症的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2002年10月至2016年1月间由2名资深外科医生实施人工耳蜗植入手术的1514例患者。对翻修病例进行识别和分析。

结果

共有52例患者(3.34%)接受了人工耳蜗植入翻修手术。骨膜下紧密口袋组的翻修率为7.18%,而骨槽缝合法组为2.37%(p<0.001)。装置故障是两组翻修手术最常见的原因。骨槽缝合法组(2.11%)与骨膜下紧密口袋组(6.88%)的装置故障率存在显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

人工耳蜗接收器/刺激器的精确固定对人工耳蜗植入成功至关重要。由于骨槽缝合法与骨膜下紧密口袋技术相比翻修率更低且并发症发生率相似,因此它应是人工耳蜗植入的首选固定技术。

相似文献

1
The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.人工耳蜗植入床准备及固定技术对再次人工耳蜗植入率的影响。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Jun;132(6):534-539. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118000609. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.使用骨膜下紧密袋而不采用缝合或骨凹技术进行人工耳蜗固定。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):1674-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24426. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
3
Comparison of Conventional Technique with Suture Fixation and Subperiosteal Tight Pocket Technique on Revision Cochlear Implantation Rate.比较传统技术与缝合固定和骨膜下紧口袋技术对修正人工耳蜗植入率的影响。
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Jul 29;20(4):301-305. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.231248.
4
Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.用于人工耳蜗植入的骨膜下袋技术中的带蒂帕尔瓦瓣
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Sep;129(9):916-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115001905.
5
228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.228例人工耳蜗接收刺激器置于紧密的骨膜下囊袋且未固定的情况。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;152(4):712-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599814567111. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.使用骨膜下囊袋技术进行人工耳蜗植入时的自发性骨床形成。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1752-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000509.
7
The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.颞肌袋技术在人工耳蜗植入中的应用:解剖学与临床研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):903-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4e904.
8
Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.骨膜下颞部口袋与标准技术在人工耳蜗植入中的比较:一项临床对比研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):987-91. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182255949.
9
A simplified fixation of the new thin cochlear implant receiver-stimulators in children: long term results with the "back-pocket" technique.儿童新型薄型人工耳蜗植入接收刺激器的简化固定方法:“后袋”技术的长期效果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;77(7):1158-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Cochlear implant failure, revision, and reimplantation.人工耳蜗植入失败、翻修和再次植入。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1670-4. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000079.

引用本文的文献

1
[Analysis of cochlear reimplantation surgery and factors influencing postoperative auditory and speech function].[人工耳蜗再植入手术及影响术后听觉和言语功能的因素分析]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 May;39(5):419-424. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.005.
2
Comparison of Conventional Technique with Suture Fixation and Subperiosteal Tight Pocket Technique on Revision Cochlear Implantation Rate.比较传统技术与缝合固定和骨膜下紧口袋技术对修正人工耳蜗植入率的影响。
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Jul 29;20(4):301-305. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.231248.
3
A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
一项单中心、患者盲法、随机、平行分组、非劣效性研究,旨在比较适合初次人工耳蜗植入的成年人中使用和不使用钻孔的耳蜗植入体接受器/刺激器装置固定技术(COMFIT)。
Trials. 2023 Sep 24;24(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7.
4
Comparison of Cochlear Implantation Complications with Subperiosteal Pocket Technique Versus Well-Drilling Technique in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study.小儿患者中骨膜下袋技术与钻孔技术人工耳蜗植入并发症的比较:一项回顾性研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1792-1798. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03735-z. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
5
Robotic Milling of Electrode Lead Channels During Cochlear Implantation in an Model.在动物模型的人工耳蜗植入过程中对电极引导通道进行机器人铣削加工
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 11;8:742147. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.742147. eCollection 2021.
6
A Retrospective Study of Cochlear Re-Implantations - Experience from a Large Centre in India.一项关于人工耳蜗再次植入的回顾性研究——来自印度一个大型中心的经验。
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):14-18. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.3976. Epub 2019 Mar 1.