Suppr超能文献

一项单中心、患者盲法、随机、平行分组、非劣效性研究,旨在比较适合初次人工耳蜗植入的成年人中使用和不使用钻孔的耳蜗植入体接受器/刺激器装置固定技术(COMFIT)。

A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, G.05.1.29, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Sep 24;24(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07568-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the cochlear implantation procedure, the receiver/stimulator (R/S) part of the implant is fixated to prevent postoperative device migration, which could have an adverse effect on the position of the electrode array in the cochlea. We aim to compare the migration rates of two fixation techniques, the bony recess versus the subperiosteal tight pocket without bony sutures.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This single-blind randomized controlled trial will recruit a total of 112 primary cochlear implantation adult patients, eligible for implantation according to the current standard of practice. Randomization will be performed by an electronic data capture system Castor EDC, with participants block randomized to either bony recess or standard subperiosteal tight pocket in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age. The primary outcome of this study is the R/S device migration rate; secondary outcomes include patient-experienced burden using the validated COMPASS questionnaire, electrode migration rate, electrode impedance values, speech perception scores, correlation between R/S migration, electrode array migration and patient complaints, assessment of complication rates, and validation of an implant position measurement method. Data will be collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery. All data analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.

DISCUSSION

Cochlear implantation by means of creating a tight subperiosteal pocket without drilling a bony seat is a minimally invasive fixation technique with many advantages. However, the safety of this technique has not yet been proven with certainty. This is the first randomized controlled trial that directly compares the minimally invasive technique with the conventional method of drilling a bony seat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register NL9698. Registered on 31 August 2021.

摘要

背景

在耳蜗植入手术过程中,将植入物的接收器/刺激器(R/S)部分固定,以防止术后设备迁移,这可能会对耳蜗内电极阵列的位置产生不利影响。我们旨在比较两种固定技术的迁移率,即骨陷窝与无骨缝合的骨下紧贴口袋。

方法与分析

这项单盲随机对照试验将招募总共 112 名符合当前标准的成人初次耳蜗植入患者。通过电子数据捕获系统 Castor EDC 进行随机分组,参与者按照 1:1 的比例分为骨陷窝组或标准骨下紧贴口袋组,按年龄分层。本研究的主要结局是 R/S 设备迁移率;次要结局包括使用经过验证的 COMPASS 问卷评估患者的负担、电极迁移率、电极阻抗值、言语感知评分、R/S 迁移、电极阵列迁移与患者抱怨之间的相关性、并发症发生率评估和植入物位置测量方法的验证。数据将在基线、术后 1 周、4 周、8 周、3 个月和 12 个月时收集。所有数据分析均将按照意向治疗原则进行。

讨论

通过创建无钻孔骨座的紧贴骨下口袋进行耳蜗植入是一种具有许多优点的微创固定技术。然而,这种技术的安全性尚未得到明确证实。这是第一项直接比较微创技术与钻孔骨座传统方法的随机对照试验。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册 NL9698。于 2021 年 8 月 31 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c661/10518101/eebcd7bf135c/13063_2023_7568_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验