Paterson Catherine, Ghaemi Joseph, Alashkham Abduelmenem, Biyani Chandra Shekhar, Coles Bernadette, Baker Lee, Szewczyk-Bieda Magdalena, Nabi Ghulam
1 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University , Garthdee, Aberdeen , UK.
2 Academic Section of Urology, Division of Cancer, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital , Dundee , UK.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20170761. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170761. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
: To determine the safety and diagnostic accuracy of renal tumour biopsies in a defined population of small renal masses (SRMs) only <4 cm using 3 × 2 table, intention to diagnose approach. 3 × 2 table approach examines indeterminate results as a separate category rather than pushing these through traditional 2 × 2 table (four-cell matrix) approach.
: A highly sensitive search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and conference proceedings (1966-2016) for the acquisition of data on the diagnostic accuracy and complications of RTB in patients with SRM <4 cm. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Test characteristics were calculated using conventional 2 × 2 contingency table analysis excluding non-diagnostic biopsies, and an intention-to-diagnose approach with a 3 × 2 table for pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity.
: A total of 20 studies were included with a total sample size of 974. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of RTB based upon univariate analysis using 2 × 2 table observed sensitivity 0.952 [confidence interval (CI) 0.908-0.979] and specificity 0.824 (CI 0.566-0.962). Using the 3 × 2 table and intention-to-diagnose principle, sensitivity 0.947 (CI 0.925-0.965) and specificity 0.609 (CI 0.385-0.803) decreased.
: RTB in SRMs (<4 cm) is associated with a high diagnostic sensitivity but poor specificity when non-diagnostic results are included by a 3 × 2 table for analysis (intention to diagnose approach). Risk of non-diagnostic results and poor quality of research need addressing through future studies, preferably by a well-designed prospective study appropriately powered for diagnostic accuracy using valid reference standards.
: A comprehensive synthesis of literature on image-guided biopsies in SRMs using a different methodology and study design.
采用3×2表格意向性诊断方法,确定在仅包括直径小于4cm的小肾肿块(SRM)特定人群中肾肿瘤活检的安全性和诊断准确性。3×2表格方法将不确定结果作为一个单独类别进行检查,而不是通过传统的2×2表格(四格矩阵)方法处理这些结果。
在考克兰图书馆、循证医学数据库、医学期刊数据库、医学期刊数据库(正在处理中)、荷兰医学文摘数据库和会议论文集(1966 - 2016年)中进行了高度敏感的检索,以获取直径小于4cm的SRM患者肾肿瘤活检的诊断准确性和并发症的数据。使用QUADAS - 2评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。使用常规2×2列联表分析(不包括非诊断性活检)计算检验特征,并使用3×2表格意向性诊断方法对敏感性和特异性进行合并估计。
共纳入20项研究,总样本量为974。基于使用2×2表格的单变量分析,肾肿瘤活检敏感性的合并估计值为0.952[置信区间(CI)0.908 - 0.979],特异性为0.824(CI 0.566 - 0.962)。采用3×2表格和意向性诊断原则时,敏感性为0.947(CI 0.925 - 0.965),特异性为0.609(CI 0.385 - 0.803),有所下降。
对于直径小于4cm的SRM,当采用3×2表格分析(意向性诊断方法)纳入非诊断性结果时,肾肿瘤活检具有较高的诊断敏感性,但特异性较差。非诊断性结果的风险和研究质量较差的问题需要通过未来的研究来解决,最好通过设计良好的前瞻性研究,使用有效的参考标准,为诊断准确性提供足够的样本量。
对采用不同方法和研究设计的SRM影像引导活检文献进行了全面综合。