Hamashima Chisato
Division of Cancer Screening Assessment and Management, Center for Public Health Science, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;48(7):673-683. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy077.
Although the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer have gradually decreased, its burden remains in East Asian countries. Gastric cancer screening has been performed in Japan since 1983, and the introduction of new screening techniques has been eagerly anticipated.
To promote evidence-based screening, the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening have been revised based on the new studies.
The guidelines for gastric cancer screening have been developed according to a previously established method. To assess evidence regarding the effectiveness of the screening methods, a systematic review was conducted based on an analytic framework including clinical questions aiming at reducing mortality from gastric cancer. The following methods were assessed for gastric cancer screening: upper gastrointestinal series (radiographic screening), gastrointestinal endoscopy (endoscopic screening), Helicobacter pylori antibody test and serum pepsinogen tests. Based on the balance of the benefits and harms of each screening method, recommendations for population-based and opportunistic screenings were formulated.
After the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening were published in 2005, several observational studies on radiographic and endoscopic screenings have been reported. Three case-control studies have evaluated mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic screening. Notably, evidence of the H. pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen tests was insufficient. Although false-positive results, false-negative results, and complications were observed in endoscopic and radiographic screenings, the complication rates were higher in endoscopic screening than in radiographic screening. Overdiagnosis was not estimated directly in both methods.
Radiographic and endoscopic screenings for gastric cancer are recommended for population-based and opportunistic screenings. The H. pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen tests are not recommended for population-based screening because of insufficient evidence.
尽管胃癌的发病率和死亡率已逐渐下降,但在东亚国家其负担依然存在。自1983年起日本就开展了胃癌筛查,人们一直热切期待新筛查技术的引入。
为推动基于证据的筛查,日本胃癌筛查指南已根据新研究进行了修订。
胃癌筛查指南是按照先前确立的方法制定的。为评估筛查方法有效性的证据,基于一个分析框架进行了系统评价,该框架包括旨在降低胃癌死亡率的临床问题。对以下胃癌筛查方法进行了评估:上消化道造影(放射学筛查)、胃肠内镜检查(内镜筛查)、幽门螺杆菌抗体检测和血清胃蛋白酶原检测。根据每种筛查方法的利弊平衡,制定了基于人群和机会性筛查的建议。
2005年日本胃癌筛查指南发布后,已有多项关于放射学和内镜筛查的观察性研究报告。三项病例对照研究评估了内镜筛查对降低胃癌死亡率的作用。值得注意的是,幽门螺杆菌抗体检测和血清胃蛋白酶原检测的证据不足。尽管在内镜和放射学筛查中均观察到假阳性结果、假阴性结果及并发症,但内镜筛查的并发症发生率高于放射学筛查。两种方法均未直接评估过度诊断情况。
推荐对基于人群和机会性筛查进行胃癌的放射学和内镜筛查。由于证据不足,不建议对基于人群的筛查采用幽门螺杆菌抗体检测和血清胃蛋白酶原检测。