• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院心跳骤停后一年生存率-术前脓毒症是否重要?

One-Year Survival after Inhospital Cardiac Arrest-Does Prearrest Sepsis Matter?

机构信息

University of Turku, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Turku, Finland.

Division of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Shock. 2018 Jul;50(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001024.

DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000001024
PMID:29889807
Abstract

AIM

Cardiac arrest is not a common complication of sepsis, although sepsis has been recognized as one condition behind cardiac arrest. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of sepsis among patients with inhospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and to determine if sepsis is associated with inferior outcome after IHCA.

METHODS

All consecutive emergency team dispatches in Turku University Hospital in 2011 to 2014 (n = 607) were retrospectively reviewed to identify the patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for IHCA (n = 301). The patient records were reviewed for the criteria of severe sepsis, organ dysfunction, and chronic comorbidities before IHCA. Outcome was followed for 1 year.

RESULTS

The criteria for prearrest severe sepsis were met by 83/301 (28%) of the patients, and 93/301 (31%) had multiorgan dysfunction (3 or more organ systems). The patients with severe sepsis had higher mortality than those without severe sepsis, increasing from 30-day mortalities of 63/83 (76%) and 151/218 (69%), respectively (P = 0.256), to 1-year mortalities of 72/83 (87%) and 164/218 (75%), respectively (P = 0.030). Emergency admission, age, immunosuppression, DM, multiorgan dysfunction, and a nonshockable rhythm were independent predictors of 1-year mortality by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Six out of 83 patients with severe sepsis before IHCA (7%) survived 1 year with good neurological outcome (CPC scale 1).

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients with IHCA have sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction, and their prognosis is worse than the prognosis of patients with IHCA in general.

摘要

目的

心跳骤停并非脓毒症的常见并发症,尽管脓毒症已被认为是心跳骤停的一种潜在病因。本研究旨在评估院内心跳骤停(IHCA)患者中脓毒症的发生率,并确定脓毒症是否与 IHCA 后预后不良相关。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年至 2014 年图尔库大学医院所有连续的急救小组调度(n=607),以确定因 IHCA 行心肺复苏术(CPR)的患者(n=301)。在发生 IHCA 之前,检查患者记录以确定严重脓毒症、器官功能障碍和慢性合并症的标准。随访 1 年以评估结果。

结果

301 例患者中,83 例(28%)符合 IHCA 前严重脓毒症标准,93 例(31%)存在多器官功能障碍(3 个或更多器官系统)。与无严重脓毒症的患者相比,患有严重脓毒症的患者死亡率更高,30 天死亡率分别从 63/83(76%)和 151/218(69%)增加至 1 年死亡率分别为 72/83(87%)和 164/218(75%)(P=0.256)。通过多变量逻辑回归分析,急诊入院、年龄、免疫抑制、DM、多器官功能障碍和非可电击节律是 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素。在 IHCA 前患有严重脓毒症的 83 例患者中,有 6 例(7%)在 1 年后有良好的神经学结局(CPC 评分 1)存活。

结论

相当比例的 IHCA 患者存在脓毒症和多器官功能障碍,其预后比一般 IHCA 患者的预后差。

相似文献

1
One-Year Survival after Inhospital Cardiac Arrest-Does Prearrest Sepsis Matter?住院心跳骤停后一年生存率-术前脓毒症是否重要?
Shock. 2018 Jul;50(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001024.
2
Survival and neurological outcome in the elderly after in-hospital cardiac arrest.院内心脏骤停后老年人的生存和神经结局。
Resuscitation. 2017 Sep;118:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
In-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation performed by the hospital emergency team: A 6-year retrospective register analysis at Danderyd University Hospital, Sweden.瑞典丹德吕德大学医院由医院急救团队进行的院内心脏骤停复苏:一项6年的回顾性登记分析
F1000Res. 2018 Jul 6;7:1013. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15373.1. eCollection 2018.
4
Neurological function before and after an in-hospital cardiac arrest - A nationwide registry-based cohort study.住院心脏骤停前后的神经功能 - 一项基于全国登记的队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110284. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110284. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Cardiac arrest outside and inside hospital in a community: mechanisms behind the differences in outcome and outcome in relation to time of arrest.院外和院内社区心脏骤停:导致结局差异和与心脏骤停时间相关结局的机制。
Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):749-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.01.015.
6
Evaluation of pre-arrest morbidity score and prognosis after resuscitation score and other clinical variables associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest in southern Sweden.瑞典南部院内心脏骤停患者的心脏骤停前发病评分、复苏后预后评分及其他临床变量的评估
Resuscitation. 2014 Oct;85(10):1370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Assessment of outcomes and differences between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support.评估使用体外生命支持进行心肺复苏治疗的院内和院外心脏骤停患者的结局和差异。
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):968-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
8
Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Morbidly Obese Patients.病态肥胖患者院内心肺复苏的结局。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Feb;3(2):174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Prearrest prediction of favourable neurological survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: The Prediction of outcome for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (PIHCA) score.院内心脏骤停后有利神经生存的预警预测:院内心脏骤停结局预测(PIHCA)评分。
Resuscitation. 2019 Oct;143:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
10
Predicting the probability of survival with mild or moderate neurological dysfunction after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: The GO-FAR 2 score.预测院内心搏骤停后轻度或中度神经功能障碍患者的生存率:GO-FAR 2 评分。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jan 1;146:162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics, Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Emergency Department Cardiac Arrest: A 14-Year Retrospective Study.急诊科心脏骤停患者的特征、结局及预后因素:一项14年的回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 11;13(16):4708. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164708.
2
In-hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients With Sepsis: A National Cohort Study.脓毒症患者的院内心脏骤停:一项全国队列研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 15;8:731266. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731266. eCollection 2021.
3
Use of SOFA score in cardiac arrest research: A scoping review.
序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在心脏骤停研究中的应用:一项范围综述。
Resusc Plus. 2020 Nov 3;4:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100040. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Emerging Trends and Hot Topics in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2010 to 2019.心肺复苏研究的新兴趋势与热点话题:2010年至2019年的文献计量分析
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 9;26:e926815. doi: 10.12659/MSM.926815.
5
Predicting cardiac arrest in the emergency department.预测急诊科的心脏骤停。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Feb 3;1(4):321-326. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12015. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Complement as a Major Inducer of Harmful Events in Infectious Sepsis.补体作为感染性脓毒症有害事件的主要诱导剂。
Shock. 2020 Nov;54(5):595-605. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001531.
7
Alleviation of sepsis‑induced cardiac dysfunction by overexpression of Sestrin2 is associated with inhibition of p‑S6K and activation of the p‑AMPK pathway.过表达 Sestrin2 减轻脓毒症诱导的心脏功能障碍与抑制 p-S6K 和激活 p-AMPK 途径有关。
Mol Med Rep. 2019 Sep;20(3):2511-2518. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10520. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
Death after awakening from post-anoxic coma: the "Best CPC" project.缺氧后昏迷苏醒后死亡:“最佳 CCP”项目。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 3;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2405-x.
9
Exploring the Protective Role and the Mechanism of Sphingosine 1 Phosphate in Endotoxic Cardiomyocytes.探讨鞘氨醇 1-磷酸在内毒素心肌细胞中的保护作用及其机制。
Shock. 2019 Oct;52(4):468-476. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001270.