European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 450, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 450, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Environ Int. 2018 Sep;118:222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
This study is a first attempt to evaluate how the major efforts made by several European cities in the frame of the Covenant of Mayors (CoM) initiative can impact the air pollution levels in the participating cities. CoM is by no mean one of the major cities initiatives aimed at mitigating climate change, supporting local authorities in the implementation of their climate action plans. Energy savings measures reported in the CoM cities' action plans have been analysed from the air quality perspective in order to find quantitative relations in the way local authorities deal with mitigation and how these practices are expected to have consequences on the air quality at urban level and finally positively impacting the citizens' health. In the paper, the air quality 2713 energy saving measures proposed by 146 cities located in 23 countries in the frame of the CoM are selected and their co-benefits for air quality and public health estimated by means of SHERPA, a fast modelling tool that mimics the behaviour of a full physically-based Chemical Transport Model. Besides evaluating the overall benefits of this subset of mitigation measures for the air quality, the study also investigates the relevance of some factors such as the implementation sector, the city size and the pollution levels in achieving the highest possible co-benefits. The results presented refer to the special field covered by the study, i.e. energy saving measures and are not automatically referable to other types of measures. Nevertheless, they clearly show how climate mitigation and air quality policies are deeply interconnected at the urban level.
本研究首次尝试评估几个欧洲城市在《市长公约》(CoM)倡议框架内所做的主要努力如何影响参与城市的空气污染水平。《市长公约》绝不是旨在缓解气候变化的主要城市倡议之一,它支持地方当局执行其气候行动计划。从空气质量的角度分析了《市长公约》城市行动计划中报告的节能措施,以找到地方当局在缓解方面的处理方式以及这些实践在城市层面上对空气质量的预期影响之间的定量关系,并最终对市民的健康产生积极影响。在本文中,选择了在《市长公约》框架内的 23 个国家的 146 个城市提出的空气质量 2713 项节能措施,并使用 SHERPA 对其空气质量和公共健康的共同效益进行了估算,SHERPA 是一种快速建模工具,可以模拟全物理化学输送模型的行为。除了评估这组缓解措施对空气质量的总体效益外,本研究还研究了一些因素的相关性,如实施部门、城市规模和污染水平,以实现最高可能的共同效益。所呈现的结果仅指研究涵盖的特殊领域,即节能措施,并不自动适用于其他类型的措施。然而,它们清楚地表明了在城市层面上,气候缓解和空气质量政策是如何紧密相关的。