State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, PR China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China; Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 828 West Peachtree St. NW, Suite 320, Atlanta, GA 30332-0595, USA.
Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 828 West Peachtree St. NW, Suite 320, Atlanta, GA 30332-0595, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 1;622-623:974-987. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.062. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
Urban expansion can lead to land use changes and, hence, threatens the ecosystems. Understanding the effects of urbanization on ecosystem services (ESs) can provide scientific guidance for land use planning and the protection of ESs. We established a framework to assess the spatial distributions of ESs based on land use changes in the Atlanta Metropolitan area (AMA) from 1985 to 2012. A new comprehensive ecosystem service (CES) index was developed to reflect the comprehensive level of ESs. Associated with the influential factors, we simulated the business as usual scenario in 2030. Four alternative scenarios, including more compact growth (MCG), riparian vegetation buffer (RVB), soil conservation (SC), and combined development (CD) scenarios were developed to explore the optimal land use strategies which can enhance the ESs. The results showed that forest and wetland had the greatest decreases, while low and high intensity built-up lands had the greatest increases. The values of CES and most of ESs decreased significantly due to the sprawling expansion of built-up land. The scenario analysis revealed that the CD scenario performs best in CES value, while it performs the worst in food supply. Compared with the RVB and SC scenarios, MCG scenario is a more optimal land use strategy to enhance the ESs without at the expense of food supply. To integrate multiple ESs into land use planning and decision making, corresponding land management policies and ecological engineering measures should be implemented to enhance: (1) the water yield and water purification in urban core counties, (2) the carbon storage, habitat quality, and recreational opportunity in counties around the core area, and (3) the soil conservation and food supply in surrounding suburban counties. The land use strategies and ecological engineering measures in this study can provide references for enhancing the ESs in the AMA and other metropolitan areas.
城市扩张可能导致土地利用变化,从而威胁到生态系统。了解城市化对生态系统服务(ESs)的影响,可以为土地利用规划和 ESs 的保护提供科学指导。我们建立了一个框架,根据 1985 年至 2012 年亚特兰大大都市区(AMA)的土地利用变化,评估 ESs 的空间分布。开发了一个新的综合生态系统服务(CES)指数,以反映 ESs 的综合水平。结合影响因素,我们模拟了 2030 年的“照常营业”情景。提出了四个替代情景,包括更紧凑的增长(MCG)、河岸植被缓冲(RVB)、土壤保持(SC)和综合发展(CD)情景,以探索可以提高 ESs 的最佳土地利用策略。结果表明,森林和湿地减少最大,而低强度和高强度建设用地增加最大。由于建设用地的蔓延扩张,CES 和大多数 ESs 的值显著下降。情景分析表明,CD 情景在 CES 值方面表现最好,而在食物供应方面表现最差。与 RVB 和 SC 情景相比,MCG 情景是一种更优的土地利用策略,可以在不牺牲食物供应的情况下提高 ESs。为了将多种 ESs 纳入土地利用规划和决策制定,应实施相应的土地管理政策和生态工程措施,以提高:(1)城市核心县的产水量和水质净化,(2)核心区周边县的碳储量、栖息地质量和娱乐机会,以及(3)周边郊区县的土壤保持和食物供应。本研究中的土地利用策略和生态工程措施可为提高 AMA 和其他大都市区的 ESs 提供参考。