Azeemuddin Muhammad, Awais Muhammad, Mubarak Fatima, Rehman Abdul, Baloch Noor Ul-Ain
1 Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan.
2 Department of Radiology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.
Neuroradiol J. 2018 Oct;31(5):496-503. doi: 10.1177/1971400918783060. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Introduction In patients with cranial venous sinus thrombosis, the occurrence of subarachnoid haemorrhage in association with haemorrhagic venous infarcts is a well described phenomenon. However, the presence of subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients with cranial venous sinus thrombosis in the absence of a haemorrhagic venous infarct is exceedingly rare. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts and scans of all patients who had cranial venous sinus thrombosis confirmed by magnetic resonance venography at our hospital between September 2004 and May 2015. The presence of subarachnoid haemorrhage was ascertained on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, susceptibility-weighted imaging and/or unenhanced computed tomography scans by a single experienced neuroradiologist. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20. Differences in the proportion of haemorrhagic venous infarcts among patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage versus those without subarachnoid haemorrhage were compared using the chi-square test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 138 patients who had cranial venous sinus thrombosis were included in the study. Seventy-three (52.9%) were women and the median age of subjects was 35 (interquartile range 22-47) years. Venous infarcts and haemorrhagic venous infarcts were noted in 20/138 (14.5%) and 62/138 (44.9%) cases, respectively. Subarachnoid haemorrhage was present in 15/138 (10.9%) cases and, in three cases, subarachnoid haemorrhage occurred in the absence of a venous infarct. Haemorrhagic venous infarcts were more prevalent ( P = 0.021) among patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (11/15) than in those without subarachnoid haemorrhage (51/123). Conclusion In patients with cranial venous sinus thrombosis, subarachnoid haemorrhage can occur even in the absence of a haemorrhagic venous infarct. The recognition of cranial venous sinus thrombosis as the underlying cause of subarachnoid haemorrhage is important to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.
引言 在颅静脉窦血栓形成患者中,蛛网膜下腔出血与出血性静脉梗死相关的情况已有详细描述。然而,在没有出血性静脉梗死的颅静脉窦血栓形成患者中出现蛛网膜下腔出血极为罕见。方法 我们回顾性分析了2004年9月至2015年5月期间在我院经磁共振静脉造影确诊为颅静脉窦血栓形成的所有患者的病历和扫描结果。由一位经验丰富的神经放射科医生通过液体衰减反转恢复序列、磁敏感加权成像和/或未增强计算机断层扫描来确定蛛网膜下腔出血的存在。使用社会科学统计软件包第20版进行统计分析。采用卡方检验比较有蛛网膜下腔出血的患者与无蛛网膜下腔出血的患者中出血性静脉梗死比例的差异。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果 本研究共纳入138例颅静脉窦血栓形成患者。其中73例(52.9%)为女性,患者的中位年龄为35岁(四分位间距22 - 47岁)。分别在20/138(14.5%)和62/138(44.9%)的病例中发现静脉梗死和出血性静脉梗死。15/138(10.9%)的病例存在蛛网膜下腔出血,其中3例在没有静脉梗死的情况下发生了蛛网膜下腔出血。有蛛网膜下腔出血的患者(11/15)比无蛛网膜下腔出血的患者(51/123)中出血性静脉梗死更为常见(P = 0.021)。结论 在颅静脉窦血栓形成患者中,即使没有出血性静脉梗死也可能发生蛛网膜下腔出血。认识到颅静脉窦血栓形成是蛛网膜下腔出血的潜在原因对于避免误诊和不恰当的治疗很重要。