• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素时机与脓毒症结局。

Antibiotic Timing and Outcomes in Sepsis.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2018 Jun;355(6):524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.02.007
PMID:29891035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effect of time spent in the emergency department (ED) and process of care on mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted on 117 patients who came through the University of Louisville Hospital ED and subsequently were directly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Variables of interest were time in the ED from triage to physical transport to the ICU, from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered, and from triage to antibiotic(s) administered. Expected mortality was calculated according to the University Health System Consortium Database. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital death and hospital length of stay in days, respectively.

RESULTS

We found no significant association between time in the ED and mortality between survivors and nonsurvivors (5.5 versus 5.7 hours, P = 0.804). After adjusting for expected mortality, a 22% increase in mortality risk was found for each hour delay from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered; a 15% increase in mortality risk was observed for each hour from triage to antibiotic(s) given. Both time from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, P = 0.044) and time from triage to antibiotic(s) delivery (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092) were independently associated with an increased hospital stay (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092).

CONCLUSION

Though no significant association between mortality and ED time was demonstrated, we observed a significant increase in mortality in septic patients with both delays in antibiotic(s) order and administration. Delay in care also resulted in increased hospital stays both overall and in the ICU.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在急诊科(ED)停留时间和治疗过程对脓毒症或感染性休克患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。

方法

对 117 名通过路易斯维尔大学医院急诊科并直接转入重症监护病房(ICU)的患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。感兴趣的变量包括从分诊到物理转运到 ICU 的 ED 时间、从分诊到开抗生素的时间以及从分诊到给予抗生素的时间。预期死亡率根据大学健康系统联盟数据库计算。主要和次要结局分别为住院期间死亡和住院天数。

结果

我们发现存活者和非存活者在 ED 停留时间与死亡率之间没有显著关联(5.5 小时与 5.7 小时,P = 0.804)。在调整预期死亡率后,从分诊到开抗生素的时间每延迟 1 小时,死亡率风险增加 22%;从分诊到给予抗生素的时间每延迟 1 小时,死亡率风险增加 15%。从分诊到开抗生素的时间(危险比 [HR] = 0.8,P = 0.044)和从分诊到给予抗生素的时间(HR = 0.79,P = 0.0092)都与住院时间延长独立相关(HR = 0.79,P = 0.0092)。

结论

尽管没有显示死亡率与 ED 时间之间存在显著关联,但我们观察到抗生素(s)的开方和给药延迟均导致脓毒症患者的死亡率显著增加。治疗的延迟也导致总住院时间和 ICU 住院时间延长。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic Timing and Outcomes in Sepsis.抗生素时机与脓毒症结局。
Am J Med Sci. 2018 Jun;355(6):524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗生素使用时机对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1907-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142.
3
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.急诊科收治的脓毒症患者延迟使用第二剂抗生素:患病率、危险因素及结局
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377.
4
Impact of the implementation of a Sepsis Code hospital protocol in antibiotic prescription and clinical outcomes in an intensive care unit.脓毒症代码医院协议的实施对重症监护病房抗生素处方及临床结局的影响。
Med Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Feb;41(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
5
Time Spent in the Emergency Department and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者在急诊科的停留时间及预后
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):94-103. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000188.
6
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
7
INITIAT-E.D.: Impact of timing of INITIation of Antibiotic Therapy on mortality of patients presenting to an Emergency Department with sepsis.抗生素治疗起始时机对因脓毒症就诊于急诊科患者死亡率的影响。
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):196-201. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12394. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
Impact of extended emergency department stay on antibiotic re-dosing delays and outcomes in sepsis.急诊科延长留观时间对脓毒症患者抗生素重新给药延迟及治疗结果的影响
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 May;55:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
9
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
10
Severe sepsis in the emergency department - an observational cohort study from the university hospital of the West Indies.急诊科的严重脓毒症——来自西印度群岛大学医院的一项观察性队列研究。
West Indian Med J. 2013 Mar;62(3):224-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects of Nanotechnology in Sepsis Therapy.纳米技术在脓毒症治疗中的进展、挑战与未来前景
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Jun 16;20:7685-7714. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S488026. eCollection 2025.
2
The feasibility of antimicrobial lead time as process and quality indicator for hospitals.抗菌药物提前期作为医院流程和质量指标的可行性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1177-1183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05085-w. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
3
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.
成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理:韩国临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Assessment of De-Escalation of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in Medical Wards with Recognized Prevalence of Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in Non-ICU Patients with Microbiologically Documented Infection.在已确认多重耐药病原体流行率的内科病房中评估经验性抗菌治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项针对微生物学确诊感染的非重症监护病房患者的多中心前瞻性队列研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;13(9):812. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090812.
5
Novel therapeutic role of Ganoderma Polysaccharides in a septic mouse model - The key role of macrophages.灵芝多糖在脓毒症小鼠模型中的新型治疗作用——巨噬细胞的关键作用
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 20;10(5):e26732. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26732. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
6
Impact of antibiotic allergy labels on timely and appropriate antibiotics for sepsis in the emergency department.抗生素过敏标签对急诊科脓毒症患者及时使用恰当抗生素的影响。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Dec 11;5(6):dlad120. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad120. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Clinical Phenotypes of Sepsis in a Cohort of Hospitalized Patients According to Infection Site.根据感染部位划分的住院患者脓毒症临床表型
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Aug 21;5(8):e0955. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000955. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Crude Mortality Associated With the Empirical Use of Polymyxins in Septic Patients in a Setting of High Prevalence of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort.在碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌高发的情况下,经验性使用多黏菌素与脓毒症患者的粗死亡率相关:队列回顾性分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 5;77(Suppl 1):S62-S69. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad272.
9
Prediction of septic and hypovolemic shock in intensive care unit patients using machine learning.利用机器学习预测重症监护病房患者的感染性休克和低血容量性休克。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(4):477-483. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220280-pt. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Systematic Review on the Effects of Prompt Antibiotic Treatment on Survival in Septic Shock and Sepsis Patients in Different Hospital Settings.关于在不同医院环境下早期抗生素治疗对感染性休克和脓毒症患者生存影响的系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Dec 11;14(12):e32405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32405. eCollection 2022 Dec.