• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality of life and psychological well-being in the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS): Importance of adopting a biopsychosocial model.多发性硬化症(MS)早期的生活质量和心理幸福感:采用生物心理社会模式的重要性。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
Personality in multiple sclerosis (MS): impact on health, psychological well-being, coping, and overall quality of life.多发性硬化症(MS)中的人格:对健康、心理健康、应对方式和整体生活质量的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Feb;22(2):152-161. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1164321. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Mediating Role of Resilience on Quality of Life in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.韧性在多发性硬化症患者生活质量中的中介作用:结构方程建模方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1152-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Should I stay or should I go? A prospective investigation examining individual factors impacting employment status among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).我该留下还是离开?一项前瞻性调查,研究影响多发性硬化症(MS)患者就业状况的个体因素。
Work. 2018;59(1):39-47. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172667.
5
Coping strategies and quality of life in Mexican multiple sclerosis patients: Physical, psychological and social factors relationship.墨西哥多发性硬化症患者的应对策略和生活质量:身体、心理和社会因素的关系。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Physical activity and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: intermediary roles of disability, fatigue, mood, pain, self-efficacy and social support.多发性硬化症患者的身体活动与生活质量:残疾、疲劳、情绪、疼痛、自我效能感及社会支持的中介作用
Psychol Health Med. 2009 Jan;14(1):111-24. doi: 10.1080/13548500802241902.
7
Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Links to acceptance, coping strategies and disease severity.多发性硬化症患者的健康相关生活质量:与接受度、应对策略和疾病严重程度的关联。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Oct;12(4):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Structural relations of illness perception, fatigue, locus of control, self-efficacy, and coping strategies in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.多发性硬化症患者的疾病感知、疲劳、控制源、自我效能和应对策略的结构关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 20;24(1):1354. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18807-0.
9
Physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中的身体活动、自我效能感和生活质量。
Ann Behav Med. 2008 Feb;35(1):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-007-9006-7. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
10
Coping strategies, cognitive impairment, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的应对策略、认知障碍、心理变量及其与生活质量的关系。
Neurol Sci. 2010 Nov;31(Suppl 2):S227-30. doi: 10.1007/s10072-010-0372-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Compared to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Fatigue and Fast Disease Progression Interferes with the Ability to Psychosocially Adjust.与肌萎缩侧索硬化症相比,多发性硬化症患者的生活质量:疲劳和疾病快速进展会干扰心理社会适应能力。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):745. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070745.
2
The influence of the Big Five inventory on quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease aged 50 and above: A Longitudinal Analysis from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).大五人格量表对50岁及以上帕金森病患者生活质量的影响:来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查(SHARE)的纵向分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0322089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322089. eCollection 2025.
3
What matters to patients with multiple sclerosis? Identifying patient-relevant attributes using a ranking exercise with open-ended answers from an online survey in Italy.多发性硬化症患者关心什么?通过对意大利一项在线调查中的开放式回答进行排序练习来确定与患者相关的属性。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 23;15(5):e095552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095552.
4
The Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Spiritual Well-Being in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者感知到的社会支持与精神健康之间的关系。
Nurs Open. 2025 May;12(5):e2204. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2204.
5
Fatigue management effects on social participation and environment management in individuals with multiple sclerosis: Quasi-experimental study.疲劳管理对多发性硬化症患者社交参与和环境管理的影响:准实验研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Feb;88(2):93-104. doi: 10.1177/03080226241280860. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
6
Exploring the mediating role of depression and anxiety in the relationship between social and biological factors and quality of life in Indonesia: a structural equation modelling approach.探究抑郁和焦虑在印度尼西亚社会与生物因素和生活质量关系中的中介作用:一种结构方程建模方法。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 28;15(4):e095110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095110.
7
Impact of Socio-Demographic Factors on Quality of Life and Coping Strategies of Children with Different Disabilities.社会人口因素对不同残疾类型儿童生活质量和应对策略的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 7;60(10):1638. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101638.
8
Neuroticism as a Common Factor in Depression and Anxiety Associated with Multiple Sclerosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.神经质作为多发性硬化症相关抑郁和焦虑的共同因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 24;21(10):1264. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101264.
9
Determination of key hub genes in Leishmaniasis as potential factors in diagnosis and treatment based on a bioinformatics study.基于生物信息学研究的利什曼病关键枢纽基因的鉴定及其在诊断和治疗中的潜在作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73779-w.
10
An Online Single-Session Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Associated with Multiple Sclerosis-Pilot Study.一项针对多发性硬化症相关抑郁和焦虑的在线单次认知行为疗法——试点研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;14(7):620. doi: 10.3390/bs14070620.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Disease: Happiness, Goals, and Meanings among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Caregivers.超越疾病:多发性硬化症患者及其照顾者的幸福、目标与意义
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 20;8:2216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02216. eCollection 2017.
2
The first year after diagnosis: psychological impact on people with multiple sclerosis.确诊后的第一年:对多发性硬化症患者的心理影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Oct;22(9):1063-1071. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1274043. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
Personality in multiple sclerosis (MS): impact on health, psychological well-being, coping, and overall quality of life.多发性硬化症(MS)中的人格:对健康、心理健康、应对方式和整体生活质量的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Feb;22(2):152-161. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1164321. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
Type D personality, mental distress, social support and health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease patients with heart failure: a longitudinal observational study.冠心病合并心力衰竭患者的D型人格、心理困扰、社会支持与健康相关生活质量:一项纵向观察性研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jan 22;13:1. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0204-2.
5
One year follow-up of a pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis.一项针对多发性硬化症患者的基于小组的疲劳管理计划(FACETS)的实用多中心随机对照试验的一年随访。
BMC Neurol. 2014 May 19;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-109.
6
Type D personality and quality of life in subjects after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后患者的D型人格与生活质量
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(7):624-30. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0066. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
7
Psychometric properties of quality of life and health-related quality of life assessments in people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者生活质量及健康相关生活质量评估的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2015-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0639-2. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
8
Longitudinal changes in quality of life and related psychosocial variables in australians with multiple sclerosis.澳大利亚多发性硬化症患者生活质量及相关心理社会变量的纵向变化
Int J MS Care. 2013 Summer;15(2):90-7. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-032.
9
Self-efficacy as a predictor of self-reported physical, cognitive, and social functioning in multiple sclerosis.自我效能作为多发性硬化症患者自我报告的身体、认知和社会功能的预测指标。
Rehabil Psychol. 2014 Feb;59(1):27-34. doi: 10.1037/a0035288. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
10
The effects of a group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.基于小组的认知行为疗法对多发性硬化症患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Mar;28(3):264-74. doi: 10.1177/0269215513501525. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

多发性硬化症(MS)早期的生活质量和心理幸福感:采用生物心理社会模式的重要性。

Quality of life and psychological well-being in the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS): Importance of adopting a biopsychosocial model.

机构信息

Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Newark, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.05.003
PMID:29891186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6177284/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reductions in quality of life (QOL) exist among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

The present investigation aimed to adopt a biopsychosocial model in examining QOL in the early stages of MS.

METHODS

Individuals with MS (34 with average to low QOL and 35 with high QOL) were compared on measures of disease symptoms, psychological functioning, personality, self-efficacy, locus of control (LOC), social support, and coping to determine the most salient predictors of QOL.

RESULTS

Individuals were matched on disease course and duration. Individuals with lower QOL reported more fatigue, sleep problems, pain, depression, and anxiety (d = 0.83-1.49, p's < 0.001). They also reported lower levels of self-efficacy, LOC, and social support (d = 0.75-1.50 p's < 0.01). They indicated higher levels of neuroticism (d = 1.31, p < .001) and lower levels of extraversion (d = 1.21, p < .001) and reported greater levels of disengagement as a means of coping (d = 0.75, p = .002). Those with high QOL endorsed more use of adaptive coping (d = 0.52 - 0.86, p's < 0.05). When taken together, LOC and anxiety were the most significant predictors, accounting for 40% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

Even early on in the illness, there exists differing levels of QOL. Identifying the psychological and social variables as well as the disease related factors is important, and in this case, may make a much greater contribution. Efforts to assure routine assessment and effective intervention aimed at these factors are warranted, particularly as an early intervention to assure maintenance/improvement in QOL among individuals with MS.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)患者的生活质量(QOL)下降。

目的

本研究旨在采用生物心理社会模式来考察 MS 早期的 QOL。

方法

将 34 名 QOL 处于中低水平的 MS 患者和 35 名 QOL 处于高水平的 MS 患者进行对比,对比项目包括疾病症状、心理功能、人格、自我效能、心理控制源(LOC)、社会支持和应对方式,以确定 QOL 的最显著预测因素。

结果

患者的疾病进程和持续时间相匹配。低 QOL 组患者报告了更多的疲劳、睡眠问题、疼痛、抑郁和焦虑(d 值为 0.83-1.49,p 值均<0.001)。他们的自我效能感、LOC 和社会支持水平也较低(d 值为 0.75-1.50,p 值均<0.01)。他们的神经质水平较高(d 值为 1.31,p 值<0.001),外向性水平较低(d 值为 1.21,p 值<0.001),采用逃避的应对方式较多(d 值为 0.75,p 值=0.002)。高 QOL 组患者更多地采用适应性应对方式(d 值为 0.52-0.86,p 值均<0.05)。综合来看,LOC 和焦虑是最重要的预测因素,占方差的 40%。

结论

即使在疾病早期,也存在不同水平的 QOL。识别心理和社会变量以及与疾病相关的因素很重要,在这种情况下,它们可能会做出更大的贡献。有必要努力确保对这些因素进行常规评估和有效干预,特别是作为一种早期干预措施,以确保 MS 患者的 QOL 保持/改善。