Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Aug;72(2):178-187. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.027. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
BACKGROUND & RATIONALE: Medicare's 2011 prospective payment system (PPS) was introduced to curb overuse of separately billable injectable drugs. After epoietin, intravenous (IV) vitamin D analogues are the biggest drug cost drivers in hemodialysis (HD) patients, but the association between PPS introduction and vitamin D therapy has been scarcely investigated.
Interrupted time-series analyses.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult US HD patients represented in the US Renal Data System between 2008 and 2013.
PPS implementation.
The cumulative dose of IV vitamin D analogues (paricalcitol equivalents) per patient per calendar quarter in prevalent HD patients. The average starting dose of IV vitamin D analogues and quarterly rates of new vitamin D use (initiations/100 person-months) in incident HD patients within 90 days of beginning HD therapy.
Segmented linear regression models of the immediate change and slope change over time of vitamin D use after PPS implementation.
Among 359,600 prevalent HD patients, IV vitamin D analogues accounted for 99% of the total use, and this trend was unchanged over time. PPS resulted in an immediate 7% decline in the average dose of IV vitamin D analogues (average baseline dose = 186.5 μg per quarter; immediate change = -13.5 μg [P < 0.001]; slope change = 0.43 per quarter [P = 0.3]) and in the starting dose of IV vitamin D analogues in incident HD patients (average baseline starting dose = 5.22 μg; immediate change = -0.40 μg [P < 0.001]; slope change = -0.03 per quarter [P = 0.03]). The baseline rate of vitamin D therapy initiation among 99,970 incident HD patients was 44.9/100 person-months and decreased over time, even before PPS implementation (pre-PPS β = -0.46/100 person-months [P < 0.001]; slope change = -0.19/100 person-months [P = 0.2]). PPS implementation was associated with an immediate change in initiation levels (by -4.5/100 person-months; P < 0.001).
Incident HD patients were restricted to those 65 years or older.
PPS implementation was associated with a 7% reduction in the average dose and starting dose of IV vitamin D analogues and a 10% reduction in the rate of vitamin D therapy initiation.
2011 年,医疗保险采用了前瞻性支付系统(PPS),以抑制可单独计费的注射用药物的过度使用。在促红细胞生成素之后,静脉内(IV)维生素 D 类似物是血液透析(HD)患者中最大的药物费用驱动因素,但 PPS 引入与维生素 D 治疗之间的关联尚未得到充分研究。
间断时间序列分析。
2008 年至 2013 年间,代表美国肾脏数据系统的成年美国 HD 患者。
PPS 实施。
在 PPS 实施后,维生素 D 使用的即时变化和随时间的斜率变化。在开始 HD 治疗后 90 天内,新的 IV 维生素 D 类似物起始治疗(起始/100 人-月)的发生率(发生率/100 人-月)。
PPS 实施后维生素 D 使用的即时变化和随时间变化的分段线性回归模型。
在 359600 例现患 HD 患者中,IV 维生素 D 类似物占总用量的 99%,且这一趋势随时间保持不变。PPS 导致 IV 维生素 D 类似物的平均剂量立即下降 7%(平均基线剂量为每季度 186.5μg;即时变化为-13.5μg[P<0.001];斜率变化为每季度 0.43[P=0.3])和新 HD 患者的 IV 维生素 D 类似物起始剂量(平均基线起始剂量为 5.22μg;即时变化为-0.40μg[P<0.001];斜率变化为每季度 0.03[P=0.03])。在 99970 例新 HD 患者中,维生素 D 治疗起始的基线率为 44.9/100 人-月,并随时间下降,甚至在 PPS 实施之前(PPS 前β=-0.46/100 人-月[P<0.001];斜率变化=-0.19/100 人-月[P=0.2])。PPS 实施与起始水平的即时变化相关(-4.5/100 人-月;P<0.001)。
新发 HD 患者仅限于 65 岁或以上的患者。
PPS 实施与 IV 维生素 D 类似物的平均剂量和起始剂量降低 7%以及维生素 D 治疗起始率降低 10%相关。