Ayyaz Ul Haq Muhammad, Nazir Sheraz A, Rashid Muhammad, Kwok Chun Shing, Mubashiruddin Syed, Alisiddiq Zaheer, Shoaib Ahmed, Ratib Karim, Mamas Mamas A, Nolan James
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom; University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
Radial artery occlusion flowing cardiac catheterisation has been linked to flow reduction and prolonged compression. We investigate whether these factors can be optimised following transradial cardiac catheterisation by using an accelerated band removal protocol facilitated by a haemostasis promoting pad, in combination with a patent haemostasis technique.
In this single centre prospective study, 389 consecutive patients undergoing TRA for coronary angiography or angioplasty were randomised to two haemostasis protocols: use of a Helix™ compression device alone (HC) or in combination with a haemostatic pad (StatSeal® disc) and an accelerated haemostasis protocol (AC). A patent haemostasis technique was employed in both study arms. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to haemostasis and the secondary safety outcome was access site related complications: re-bleeding, haematoma and radial artery patency assessed within 24 h using reverse Barbeau's Test (BT).
Between May and Nov 2017, 191 patients were randomised to receive HC and 198 patients to AC. Compression time was significantly higher with HC as compared to AC (165.8 ± 63.1 versus 79.7 ± 41.2 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in re-bleeding and RAO between groups (3.7% versus 5.6%, p = 0.37 and 6.3% versus 4.1%, p = 0.33) respectively. Incidence of haematoma was higher in AC group (4.7% versus 12.1%, p = 0.009).
A reduction in radial artery compression time can be achieved by using Statseal in association with an accelerated haemostasis protocol without increasing the risk of access site bleeding and RAO. The combination of reduced compression time combined with maintained radial flow via patent haemostasis has the potential to reduce the risk of radial occlusion after transradial catheterisation.
桡动脉闭塞性心脏导管插入术与血流减少和压迫时间延长有关。我们研究在经桡动脉心脏导管插入术后,通过使用促进止血垫辅助的加速绷带移除方案,并结合专利止血技术,这些因素是否可以得到优化。
在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,389例连续接受经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或血管成形术的患者被随机分为两种止血方案:单独使用Helix™压迫装置(HC)或与止血垫(StatSeal®盘)及加速止血方案(AC)联合使用。两个研究组均采用专利止血技术。主要疗效终点是止血时间,次要安全性结局是穿刺部位相关并发症:再出血、血肿以及使用反向巴贝au试验(BT)在24小时内评估的桡动脉通畅情况。
2017年5月至11月期间,191例患者被随机分配接受HC,198例患者接受AC。与AC相比,HC的压迫时间显著更长(165.8±63.1分钟对79.7±41.2分钟,p<0.001)。两组之间再出血和桡动脉闭塞的发生率无显著差异(分别为3.7%对5.6%,p=0.37;6.3%对4.1%,p=0.3)。AC组血肿发生率更高(4.7%对12.1%,p=0.009)。
联合使用Statseal和加速止血方案可减少桡动脉压迫时间,且不增加穿刺部位出血和桡动脉闭塞的风险。缩短压迫时间并通过专利止血技术维持桡动脉血流,这两者相结合有可能降低经桡动脉导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的风险。