Lia F, Morote Castellano A, Zammit-Mangion M, Farrugia C
1Department of Chemistry, University of Malta, Room 330 Chemistry Building, Msida, MSD2030 Malta.
Instituto de Educación Secundaria Virgen del Remedio, Alicante, Spain.
J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Jun;55(6):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3131-0. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
Fluorescence spectrometry, combined with principle component analysis, partial least-squares regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN), was applied for the analysis of Maltese extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) adulterated by blending with vegetable oil (corn oil, soybean oil, linseed oil, or sunflower oil). The novel results showed that adjusted PLSR models based on synchronised spectra for detecting the % amount of EVOO in vegetable oil blends had a lower root mean square error (0.02-6.27%) and higher R (0.983-1.000) value than those observed when using PLSR on the whole spectrum. This study also highlights the use of ANN as an alternative chemometric tool for the detection of olive oil adulteration. The performance of the model generated by the ANN is highly dependent both on the type of data input and the mode of cross validation; for spectral data which had a variable importance plot value > 0.8 the excluded row cross validation was more appropriate while for complete spectral analysis -fold or CV-10 was more appropriate.
荧光光谱法结合主成分分析、偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和人工神经网络(ANN),用于分析与植物油(玉米油、大豆油、亚麻籽油或葵花籽油)混合掺假的马耳他特级初榨橄榄油(EVOO)。新的结果表明,基于同步光谱检测植物油混合物中EVOO百分比含量的调整后PLSR模型,其均方根误差较低(0.02 - 6.27%),R值较高(0.983 - 1.000),高于在全光谱上使用PLSR时观察到的结果。本研究还强调了使用ANN作为检测橄榄油掺假的替代化学计量工具。ANN生成的模型性能高度依赖于数据输入类型和交叉验证模式;对于变量重要性图值> 0.8的光谱数据,排除行交叉验证更合适,而对于完整光谱分析,10折交叉验证(CV-10)更合适。