Suppr超能文献

加纳的辅助生殖技术:跨国业务、当地实践与“更经济实惠”的体外受精

Assisted reproductive technologies in Ghana: transnational undertakings, local practices and 'more affordable' IVF.

作者信息

Gerrits Trudie

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, Department of Anthropology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Jun 21;2:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.

Abstract

The article sketches the origins and development of IVF in Ghana as a highly transnational undertaking. Movements are from and to Africa, involving human beings (providers and users), and also refer to other entities such as technologies, skills and knowledge. None of these movements are paid for using public money, neither are they subsidized by international health organizations. Currently, 'more affordable' IVF is being introduced into Ghana, on initiative of the first Association of Childless Couples of Ghana (ACCOG), in collaboration with the Belgium based non-profit organization the Walking Egg (tWE), representing another form of transnational networking. The article underlines the scarcity of well-trained embryologists in Ghana, which turns the embryologists' expertise and skills into a scarce and precious commodity and guarantees this expertise becomes a major challenge for the directors of the private clinics. Next to local Ghanaian couples, the clinics also attend to transnational reproductive travellers, including women and men from neighbouring countries and Ghanaians in the diaspora returning to their country of origin. Their manifold motivations to cross borders and visit the IVF clinics in Ghana provide insight into the structural conditions impeding or facilitating the use of assisted reproductive technologies at different local sites. Transnational movements also include the flow of new procreation practices (such as surrogacy and the use of donor material), which (re-)shape existing cultural and societal notions regarding kinship and the importance of blood/genetic ties. Finally, the article lists a number of thematic and theoretical issues which require further exploration and studies.

摘要

本文概述了体外受精技术在加纳作为一项高度跨国事业的起源和发展。人员流动往返于非洲各地,涉及人(提供者和使用者),也涉及技术、技能和知识等其他实体。这些流动均未使用公共资金支付费用,也未得到国际卫生组织的补贴。目前,在加纳首个无子女夫妇协会(ACCOG)的倡议下,与比利时非营利组织“行走的卵子”(tWE)合作,“更实惠”的体外受精技术正被引入加纳,这代表了另一种跨国网络形式。文章强调了加纳训练有素的胚胎学家的稀缺,这使得胚胎学家的专业知识和技能成为一种稀缺而珍贵的商品,并确保这种专业知识成为私人诊所主任面临的一项重大挑战。除了加纳当地夫妇,这些诊所还接待跨国生殖游客,包括来自邻国的男女以及散居海外后回国的加纳人。他们跨越国界前往加纳体外受精诊所的多种动机,为深入了解在不同地方阻碍或促进辅助生殖技术使用的结构条件提供了线索。跨国流动还包括新的生育实践(如代孕和使用捐赠材料)的传播,这(重新)塑造了关于亲属关系以及血缘/基因关系重要性的现有文化和社会观念。最后,文章列出了一些需要进一步探索和研究的主题和理论问题。

相似文献

1
Assisted reproductive technologies in Ghana: transnational undertakings, local practices and 'more affordable' IVF.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Jun 21;2:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.002. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Transnational connections of health professionals: medicoscapes and assisted reproduction in Ghana and Uganda.
Ethn Health. 2016 Aug;21(4):357-74. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2015.1105184. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
3
Reproductive Travel to Ghana: Testimonies, Transnational Relationships, and Stratified Reproduction.
Med Anthropol. 2018 Feb-Mar;37(2):131-144. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2017.1419223. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Accounting for the money-made parenthood of transnational surrogacy.
Anthropol Med. 2018 Dec;25(3):280-295. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2017.1392100. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
IVF in Africa: what is it all about?
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Mar;11(1):65-76.
6
Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
8
Transition to motherhood following the use of assisted reproductive technologies: Experiences of women in Ghana.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0266721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266721. eCollection 2022.
10
Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

4
Chains of extraction: shifting bioeconomies in India and East Africa.
Front Sociol. 2024 Jul 26;9:1149368. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1149368. eCollection 2024.
5
Legal and ethical challenges in assisted reproductive technology practice in Ghana.
Ghana Med J. 2024 Mar;58(1):78-85. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i1.11.
6
Access to assisted reproductive technologies in sub-Saharan Africa: fertility professionals' views.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2355790. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2355790. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
'It's like donating blood': Ghanaian university students' knowledge and attitudes towards egg and sperm donation.
Heliyon. 2024 May 3;10(9):e30637. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30637. eCollection 2024 May 15.
8
Peer-to-peer counselling and emotional guidance on infertility in Britain and Belgium (1970s-1980s).
Med Humanit. 2023 Jun;49(2):214-224. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012505. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
9
Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 1;2023(2):hoad007. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad007. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Transnational connections of health professionals: medicoscapes and assisted reproduction in Ghana and Uganda.
Ethn Health. 2016 Aug;21(4):357-74. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2015.1105184. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
2
Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
3
The ambiguity of patient-centred practices: the case of a Dutch fertility clinic.
Anthropol Med. 2014;21(2):125-35. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2014.914804. Epub 2014 May 14.
4
ARVs and ARTs: medicoscapes and the unequal place-making for biomedical treatments in sub-Saharan Africa.
Med Anthropol Q. 2014 Jun;28(2):182-202. doi: 10.1111/maq.12091. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
5
Accessible and affordable IVF: is Bob Edwards' dream about to become reality?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):265-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.001.
6
First births with a simplified culture system for clinical IVF and embryo transfer.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):310-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
7
Is global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg Project.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
8
Biomedical techniques in context: on the appropriation of biomedical procedures and artifacts.
Med Anthropol. 2012;31(3):179-95. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2011.636410.
9
The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;24(3):158-63. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328352140a.
10
Cross-border reproductive care: a future research agenda.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):665-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验