• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家科学技术委员会(Conacyt)研究人员对科技公共传播的态度和看法。

Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology.

作者信息

Sanz Merino Noemí, Tarhuni Navarro Daniela H

机构信息

University of Balearic Islands, Spain.

National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/0963662518781466. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/0963662518781466
PMID:29893183
Abstract

This study aims to explore the perceptions and attitudes toward Public Communication of Science and Technology of the researchers of the National Council of Science and Technology (Conacyt), in order to provide a diagnosis about the ways the Mexican scientists are involved in public communication and to contribute to the visibility of researchers' needs in being able to popularize science. The results show significant differences among the researchers' opinions with respect to their perceptions about science communication, the ways they participate in PUS activities and their identified needs. In general, the researchers of Conacyt perceived public communication as very important. However, lack of time and of academic recognition stood out as determining factors in their low contribution to science popularization. We conclude that, to achieve a culture of Public Engagement in public communication of science and technology among R&D institutions, the Mexican Administration should address the above-mentioned unfavorable professional circumstances.

摘要

本研究旨在探究国家科学技术委员会(Conacyt)研究人员对科技公共传播的认知和态度,以便对墨西哥科学家参与公共传播的方式进行诊断,并有助于了解研究人员在科普方面的需求。结果表明,研究人员在科学传播认知、参与公众理解科学(PUS)活动的方式以及他们所确定的需求方面存在显著差异。总体而言,Conacyt的研究人员认为公共传播非常重要。然而,时间不足和缺乏学术认可成为他们对科普贡献较低的决定性因素。我们得出结论,为了在研发机构中实现科技公共传播的公众参与文化,墨西哥政府应解决上述不利的职业状况。

相似文献

1
Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology.国家科学技术委员会(Conacyt)研究人员对科技公共传播的态度和看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/0963662518781466. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.科学家对公民理解科学的程度及其在公众参与活动中的作用的看法和态度。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.
3
A study on biomedical researchers' perspectives on public engagement in Southeast Asia.一项关于东南亚生物医学研究人员对公众参与看法的研究。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 8;8:202. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19040.2. eCollection 2023.
4
Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.立陶宛科学家的科学传播行为和观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Apr;29(3):353-362. doi: 10.1177/0963662520907001. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
5
Values and vendettas: Populist science governance in Mexico.价值观与宿怨:墨西哥的民粹主义科学治理。
Soc Stud Sci. 2023 Apr;53(2):213-241. doi: 10.1177/03063127221140020. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.衡量新兴技术的风险/效益感知及其对公众舆论向科学传播的潜在影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Oct;21(7):830-47. doi: 10.1177/0963662510390159. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
7
[The modeling of science: the example of North America].[科学的建模:以北美为例]
Rev Invest Clin. 2004 Sep-Oct;56(5):665-74.
8
Mexico's Program for Science and Technology, 1978 to 1982.
Science. 1979 Jun 22;204(4399):1279-82. doi: 10.1126/science.204.4399.1279.
9
A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.科学家与传播学学者对于科学家公众参与活动的观点比较。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/0963662518797002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
10
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑:为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.