Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 1;101(3):650-660. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.058. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
To evaluate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for metachronous oligometastatic ovarian cancer patients in terms of local control, delay of systemic treatment, survival outcomes, and toxicity.
Retrospective data collection from a single institution was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive disease in ovarian cancer patients during or after systemic therapy; (2) surgery or other local therapies not feasible; and (3) relative contraindication to systemic therapy for reasons such as unavailability of additional chemotherapy lines or refusal of the patient. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. A new systemic therapy regimen was started after an SBRT treatment course in 57 of 109 cases (52.3%). Local progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. The systemic treatment-free interval was calculated in cases without concomitant systemic therapy.
Between May 2012 and December 2016, 82 patients (156 lesions) underwent SBRT with a median dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions. The median follow-up period was 17.4 months. Patients received a median of 3 systemic therapy regimens prior to SBRT. Concomitant systemic therapy was performed for 29 lesions (18.6%). Among 152 evaluable lesions, a complete radiologic response, partial response, stabilization, and progressive disease were observed in 91 (60%), 26 (17%), 24 (16%), and 11 (7%), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. The median systemic treatment-free interval after SBRT was 7.4 months, and 1 of 3 patients was disease free at 1 year after SBRT. The actuarial 2-year local progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 68%, 18%, and 71%, respectively. The pattern of failure was predominantly out of field.
SBRT for oligometastatic ovarian cancer showed good local control and a good toxicity profile. It might be an appealing alternative to other invasive local therapies to delay systemic therapy in the case of chemorefractory disease or intolerance to systemic agents.
评估立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗卵巢癌同期或异时寡转移患者的局部控制、延迟全身治疗、生存结局和毒性。
对单中心的回顾性数据进行了采集。纳入标准如下:(1)卵巢癌患者在全身治疗期间或之后寡复发或寡进展;(2)手术或其他局部治疗不可行;(3)由于缺乏额外的化疗方案或患者拒绝等原因存在相对的系统治疗禁忌。使用实体瘤反应评估标准和不良事件通用术语标准 4.03 分别评估肿瘤反应和毒性。在 109 例患者中的 57 例(52.3%)中,在 SBRT 治疗后开始了新的全身治疗方案。通过 Kaplan-Meier 法计算局部无进展生存期、无进展生存期和总生存期。在没有同时进行全身治疗的情况下,计算全身治疗无进展间隔。
2012 年 5 月至 2016 年 12 月,82 例患者(156 个病灶)接受了中位剂量为 24 Gy 的 3 次分割 SBRT。中位随访时间为 17.4 个月。患者在 SBRT 前接受了中位 3 种全身治疗方案。同时进行了 29 个病灶(18.6%)的全身治疗。在 152 个可评估的病灶中,91 个(60%)、26 个(17%)、24 个(16%)和 11 个(7%)分别观察到完全影像学缓解、部分缓解、稳定和进展。没有观察到 3 级或 4 级急性或迟发性毒性。SBRT 后中位全身治疗无进展间隔为 7.4 个月,1 例患者在 SBRT 后 1 年无疾病。2 年局部无进展生存率、无进展生存率和总生存率分别为 68%、18%和 71%。失败模式主要是野外。
SBRT 治疗卵巢癌寡转移显示出良好的局部控制和良好的毒性特征。在化学耐药性疾病或不耐受全身药物的情况下,它可能是延迟全身治疗的一种有吸引力的替代方法,替代其他侵袭性局部治疗。