• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患儿的兄弟姐妹在参与团体干预后的抑郁和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。

Depression and Quality of Life in Siblings of Children With Cancer After Group Intervention Participation: A Randomized Control Trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children.

Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network.

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Nov 1;43(10):1093-1103. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy040.

DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsy040
PMID:29893947
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to (1) assess the effects of a group intervention called Siblings Coping Together on siblings' psychosocial adjustment compared with controls; (2) explore the potential moderating effect of siblings' gender; and (3) investigate whether the intervention was more effective for siblings with more depressive symptoms at baseline.

METHODS

This was a repeated measure, parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two groups. Seventy-five healthy siblings (7-16 years old, 41 males) participated. Both groups had 8 weekly 2-hr sessions. Intervention sessions had psychoeducational, social, and therapeutic problem-solving goals taught through games and crafts (n = 41); controls (n = 34) had games and crafts only. Self-reported symptoms of depression (Children's Depression Inventory, CDI) and self- and proxy-reported quality of life (QOL) (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, PedsQL) were obtained at baseline, postintervention, and 3 months later. Multivariable analyses with a mixed effects model were performed.

RESULTS

No significant main group effect or group × time interactions were found for any of the scales assessed. Significant improvement over time was found for total CDI (p < .01) and proxy-reported PedsQL total (p < .001) in both groups, which may have been attributable to the passage of time.

CONCLUSIONS

No sufficient evidence was obtained for the efficacy of the intervention in the current study. Future research may examine conducting a larger RCT comparing sibling support group to no treatment control group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(1)评估一种名为“兄弟姐妹共同应对”的小组干预措施对兄弟姐妹心理社会适应的影响,并与对照组进行比较;(2)探讨兄弟姐妹性别差异的潜在调节作用;(3)探究该干预措施对于基线时抑郁症状更严重的兄弟姐妹是否更为有效。

方法

这是一项具有两组的重复测量、平行随机对照试验(RCT)。共有 75 名健康兄弟姐妹(7-16 岁,41 名男性)参与。两组均接受 8 周每周 2 小时的 8 次干预。干预组通过游戏和手工艺进行心理教育、社交和治疗性问题解决目标的教学(n=41);对照组(n=34)仅进行游戏和手工艺活动。在基线、干预后和 3 个月后,使用儿童抑郁量表(CDI)和儿童生活质量量表(PedsQL)自我报告和代理报告评估抑郁症状(儿童抑郁量表,CDI)和自我和代理报告的生活质量(儿科生活质量量表,PedsQL)。采用混合效应模型进行多变量分析。

结果

在评估的任何量表上,均未发现主要组间效应或组间×时间交互作用。两组的总分 CDI(p<0.01)和代理报告的 PedsQL 总分(p<0.001)均随时间显著改善,这可能归因于时间的推移。

结论

本研究未获得干预措施有效性的充分证据。未来的研究可以检验比较兄弟姐妹支持小组与无治疗对照组的更大规模 RCT。

相似文献

1
Depression and Quality of Life in Siblings of Children With Cancer After Group Intervention Participation: A Randomized Control Trial.癌症患儿的兄弟姐妹在参与团体干预后的抑郁和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Nov 1;43(10):1093-1103. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy040.
2
A randomized controlled trial of a group intervention for siblings of children with cancer: Changes in symptoms of anxiety in siblings and caregivers.一项针对癌症患儿兄弟姐妹的团体干预的随机对照试验:兄弟姐妹和照顾者焦虑症状的变化。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1629-1634. doi: 10.1002/pon.4707. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
"It's Just for Us!" Perceived Benefits of Participation in a Group Intervention for Siblings of Children With Cancer.“这是专为我们而设的!”参与儿童癌症患者兄弟姐妹小组干预的感知益处。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;43(9):995-1003. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy026.
4
One month after diagnosis: quality of life, coping and previous functioning in siblings of children with cancer.确诊后一个月:癌症患儿兄弟姐妹的生活质量、应对方式及既往功能状况
Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Jan;31(1):75-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00459.x.
5
Feasibility of group intervention for bereaved siblings after pediatric cancer death.小儿癌症死亡后对丧亲兄弟姐妹进行团体干预的可行性。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017 Mar-Apr;35(2):220-238. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1252823. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
The impact of Prader-Willi syndrome on the family's quality of life and caregiving, and the unaffected siblings' psychosocial adjustment.普拉德-威利综合征对家庭生活质量和照护的影响,以及未受影响的兄弟姐妹的社会心理调整。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Sep;57(9):861-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01634.x. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
7
Psychosocial functioning and risk factors among siblings of children with cancer: An updated systematic review.癌症患儿的兄弟姐妹的心理社会功能和风险因素:一项更新的系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1467-1479. doi: 10.1002/pon.4669. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Quality of life in pediatric oncology patients, caregivers and siblings after psychosocial screening: a randomized controlled trial.心理社会筛查后儿科肿瘤患者、照顾者及兄弟姐妹的生活质量:一项随机对照试验
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3659-3668. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05160-x. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
9
Siblings of pediatric cancer patients: the quantitative and qualitative nature of quality of life.儿科癌症患者的兄弟姐妹:生活质量的定量和定性特征
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;23(1):87-108. doi: 10.1300/J077v23n01_06.
10
Psychological interventions with siblings of pediatric cancer patients: a systematic review.儿科癌症患者的兄弟姐妹的心理干预:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2009 Dec;18(12):1241-51. doi: 10.1002/pon.1565.

引用本文的文献

1
Social support and siblings of children with cancer: A scoping review.癌症患儿的社会支持和兄弟姐妹:范围综述。
Psychooncology. 2021 Aug;30(8):1232-1245. doi: 10.1002/pon.5689. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Advances in pediatric psychooncology.儿童心理肿瘤学的进展
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):41-47. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000851.