Nanotechnology Characterization Lab, Cancer Research Technology Program , Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute , Frederick , Maryland 21702 , United States.
Nano Lett. 2018 Jul 11;18(7):4309-4321. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01283. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Nucleic acid nanoparticles (NANPs) have evolved as a new class of therapeutics with the potential to detect and treat diseases. Despite tremendous advancements in NANP development, their immunotoxicity, one of the major impediments in clinical translation of traditional therapeutic nucleic acids (TNAs), has never been fully characterized. Here, we describe the first systematically studied immunological recognition of 25 representative RNA and DNA NANPs selected to have different design principles and physicochemical properties. We discover that, unlike traditional TNAs, NANPs used without a delivery carrier are immunoquiescent. We show that interferons (IFNs) are the key cytokines triggered by NANPs after their internalization by phagocytic cells, which agrees with predictions based on the experiences with TNAs. However, in addition to type I IFNs, type III IFNs also serve as reliable biomarkers of NANPs, which is usually not characteristic of TNAs. We show that overall immunostimulation relies on NANP shapes, connectivities, and compositions. We demonstrate that, like with traditional TNAs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells serve as the primary interferon producers among all peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with NANPs, and scavenger receptor-mediated uptake and endosomal Toll-like receptor signaling are essential for NANP immunorecognition. The TLR involvement, however, is different from that expected for traditional TNA recognition. Based on these results, we suggest that NANP technology may serve as a prototype of auxiliary molecular language for communication with the immune system and the modulation of immune responses.
核酸纳米颗粒(NANP)已发展成为一类新的治疗药物,具有检测和治疗疾病的潜力。尽管在 NANP 开发方面取得了巨大进展,但它们的免疫毒性一直是传统治疗性核酸(TNA)临床转化的主要障碍之一,尚未得到充分表征。在这里,我们描述了首次系统研究的 25 种代表性 RNA 和 DNA NANP 的免疫学识别,这些 NANP 是根据不同的设计原则和物理化学性质选择的。我们发现,与传统 TNA 不同,未使用递送载体的 NANP 是免疫惰性的。我们表明,干扰素(IFN)是 NANP 被吞噬细胞内化后触发的关键细胞因子,这与基于 TNA 经验的预测一致。然而,除了 I 型 IFN 外,III 型 IFN 也可作为 NANP 的可靠生物标志物,这通常不是 TNA 的特征。我们表明,整体免疫刺激依赖于 NANP 的形状、连接性和组成。我们证明,与传统 TNA 一样,NANP 处理的所有外周血单核细胞中,浆细胞样树突状细胞是产生干扰素的主要细胞,而清道夫受体介导的摄取和内体 Toll 样受体信号对于 NANP 的免疫识别至关重要。然而,TLR 的参与与传统 TNA 识别所预期的不同。基于这些结果,我们认为 NANP 技术可能成为与免疫系统交流和调节免疫反应的辅助分子语言的原型。
Molecules. 2022-12-27
Nat Rev Cancer. 2025-8-1
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2025
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2025-6
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025-4-16
DNA RNA Nanotechnol. 2016
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018-5-16
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018-4-16
Nat Biotechnol. 2018-2-12
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017-12-15
Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017-11-21