Albuquerque Plínio Luna, Mendonça Thyciane, Campêlo Mayara, Shirahige Lívia, Monte-Silva Kátia
Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Spinal Cord. 2018 Nov;56(11):1022-1031. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0149-0. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
To summarize the available evidence regarding the effects of trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on spinal monosynaptic circuit excitability in healthy individuals.
Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Brazil.
Abstract screening was performed independently by two authors for studies found in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and LILACS. If the authors were unable to agree, a third reviewer was consulted. Randomized clinical trials that reported monosynaptic reflex measures were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias, and information extracted about the spinal neurophysiological and stimulation protocols and their results.
The initial search identified 538 studies. After applying the inclusion criteria and excluding duplicates, seven crossover studies were included in the risk of bias assessment, and six studies in the meta-analyses. The meta-analysis results did not show any significant differences between anodal (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.09, 95% CI = -0.72 to 0.55, p = 0.79, I = 67%) or cathodal tsDCS (pooled SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = -0.07 to 0.63, p = 0.11, I = 0%) and sham tsDCS for Hoffmann reflex modulation.
tsDCS did not affect the Hoffmann reflex, as shown in six studies. However, these findings come from studies with selection, performance and detection bias, and further research is needed to examine the effect of this intervention.
系统评价与荟萃分析。
总结关于经脊髓直流电刺激(tsDCS)对健康个体脊髓单突触回路兴奋性影响的现有证据。
巴西应用神经科学实验室。
由两位作者独立对以下数据库中检索到的研究进行摘要筛选:PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science和LILACS。若两位作者意见不一致,则咨询第三位评审员。纳入报告单突触反射测量结果的随机临床试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估方法学质量,并提取有关脊髓神经生理学、刺激方案及其结果的信息。
初步检索共识别出538项研究。应用纳入标准并排除重复项后,7项交叉研究纳入偏倚风险评估,6项研究纳入荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果显示,对于霍夫曼反射调节,阳极tsDCS(合并标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.09,95%CI=-0.72至0.55,p=0.79,I²=67%)或阴极tsDCS(合并SMD=0.28,95%CI=-0.07至0.63,p=0.11,I²=0%)与假tsDCS之间均无显著差异。
六项研究表明,tsDCS不影响霍夫曼反射。然而,这些研究存在选择、实施和检测偏倚,需要进一步研究以检验这种干预措施的效果。