Konopka Joseph, Weitzler Lydia, Westrich Daniel, Wright Timothy M, Westrich Geoffrey H
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Dec 6;4(2):200-204. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.11.001. eCollection 2018 Jun.
Posterior stabilized constrained (PSC) inserts are intended to provide greater varus-valgus and rotational constraint than conventional PS inserts. We determined whether the added constraint resulted in more damage to the post in PSC compared to PS inserts. Retrieved PSC inserts were matched to retrieved PS inserts from the same manufacturer according to patient age, body mass index, and length of implantation. Surface damage was visually assessed, and 3-D surface deviation from pristine was measured. Damage scores for the PSC posts were significantly greater than those of the PS posts. Surface deviation was significantly greater in the posterior and medial post regions of the PSC inserts. Based on short-term follow-up, our results suggest that added constraint is accompanied by greater polyethylene surface damage.
后稳定型限制(PSC)衬垫旨在比传统的后交叉韧带替代(PS)衬垫提供更大的内外翻和旋转限制。我们确定与PS衬垫相比,增加的限制是否会导致PSC中后交叉韧带替代物更多的损伤。根据患者年龄、体重指数和植入时间,将回收的PSC衬垫与同一制造商回收的PS衬垫进行匹配。通过视觉评估表面损伤,并测量与原始状态的三维表面偏差。PSC后交叉韧带替代物的损伤评分显著高于PS后交叉韧带替代物。PSC衬垫后内侧区域的表面偏差显著更大。基于短期随访,我们的结果表明增加的限制伴随着更大的聚乙烯表面损伤。