• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床虚弱量表与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的结局。

Clinical frailty scale and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting.

机构信息

Hamburg University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.

National Center of Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1102-1109. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy222.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezy222
PMID:29897529
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of frailty on the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and whether it may improve the predictive ability of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II).

METHODS

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was assessed preoperatively in patients undergoing isolated CABG from the multicentre E-CABG registry, and patients were stratified into 3 classes: scores 1-2, scores 3-4 and scores 5-7.

RESULTS

Of the 6156 patients enrolled, 39.2% had CFS scores 1-2, 57.6% scores 3-4, and 3.2% scores 5-7. Logistic regression adjusted for multiple covariates showed that the CFS was an independent predictor of hospital/30-day mortality [CFS scores 3-4, odds ratio (OR) 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-7.14; CFS scores 5-7, OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.67-13.05] and resulted in an Integrated Improvement Index of 1.3 (P < 0.001) and a Net Reclassification Index of 55.6 (P < 0.001) for prediction of hospital/30-day mortality. Adding the CFS classes to EuroSCORE II resulted in an Integrated Improvement Index of 0.9 (P < 0.001) and Net Reclassification Index of 59.6 (P < 0.001) for prediction of hospital/30-day mortality with a significantly larger area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.809 vs 0.781, P = 0.028). The CFS was an independent predictor of mid-term mortality [CFS scores 3-4, hazard ratio (HR) 2.05, 95% CI 1.43-2.85; CFS scores 5-7, HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.83-5.06].

CONCLUSIONS

The CFS predicted early- and mid-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated CABG. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether frailty may improve the estimation of the operative risk of patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT02319083.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估衰弱对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后结局的影响,以及它是否可以提高欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE II)的预测能力。

方法

从多中心 E-CABG 登记处评估接受单纯 CABG 的患者术前的临床虚弱量表(CFS),并将患者分为 3 个等级:评分 1-2、评分 3-4 和评分 5-7。

结果

在纳入的 6156 例患者中,39.2%的患者 CFS 评分为 1-2,57.6%的患者 CFS 评分为 3-4,3.2%的患者 CFS 评分为 5-7。多变量校正的逻辑回归显示,CFS 是住院/30 天死亡率的独立预测因子[CFS 评分 3-4,比值比(OR)3.95,95%置信区间(CI)2.19-7.14;CFS 评分 5-7,OR 5.90,95%CI 2.67-13.05],并导致综合改善指数增加 1.3(P<0.001),对住院/30 天死亡率的净重新分类指数增加 55.6(P<0.001)。将 CFS 分级添加到 EuroSCORE II 中,对住院/30 天死亡率的预测,综合改善指数增加 0.9(P<0.001),净重新分类指数增加 59.6(P<0.001),并显著增加了接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(0.809 比 0.781,P=0.028)。CFS 是中期死亡率的独立预测因子[CFS 评分 3-4,风险比(HR)2.05,95%CI 1.43-2.85;CFS 评分 5-7,HR 3.05,95%CI 1.83-5.06]。

结论

CFS 预测了接受单纯 CABG 的患者的早期和中期死亡率。需要进一步的研究来评估衰弱是否可以改善成人心脏手术患者手术风险的估计。

临床试验注册号

NCT02319083。

相似文献

1
Clinical frailty scale and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting.临床虚弱量表与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的结局。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1102-1109. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy222.
2
EuroSCORE II and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for risk evaluation: an observational longitudinal study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.EuroSCORE II 和 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽用于风险评估:冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的观察性纵向研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):75-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu088. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
3
Frailty and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Comparison of Different Frailty Measures.衰弱与老年住院患者不良结局风险:不同衰弱测量指标的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):638.e7-638.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
The Chinese coronary artery bypass grafting registry study: how well does the EuroSCORE predict operative risk for Chinese population?中国冠状动脉旁路移植术注册研究:欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)对中国人群手术风险的预测效果如何?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
5
Frailty assessment and risk prediction by GRACE score in older patients with acute myocardial infarction.应用 GRACE 评分评估老年急性心肌梗死患者的脆弱性和预测风险。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1500-9.
6
Predicting operative mortality in octogenarians for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a retrospective study.预测八旬老人单纯冠状动脉旁路移植手术的手术死亡率:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Nov 2;17(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0706-z.
7
Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在美国大型数据库中的表现:对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;46(3):400-8; discussion 408. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation predicts long-term survival in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统可预测冠状动脉搭桥术患者的长期生存率。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jan;25(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00651-1.
9
Validation of a New Classification Method of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery.冠状动脉手术患者术后并发症新分类方法的验证
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):330-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
Early mortality from off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery in Canada: a comparison of the STS and the EuroSCORE risk prediction algorithms.加拿大非体外循环和体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的早期死亡率:胸外科医师协会(STS)和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)风险预测算法的比较
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Sep;23(11):879-83. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70843-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A simplified clinical frailty scale predicts mortality in emergency department patients with acute dyspnea.简化临床衰弱量表可预测急诊科急性呼吸困难患者的死亡率。
Geroscience. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01864-7.
2
Impact of frailty on outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱对冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02728-1.
3
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Frailty: From Young to Superaged Coexisting HFpEF and Frailty.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭与衰弱:从青年到超高龄并存的射血分数保留的心力衰竭和衰弱
Int J Heart Fail. 2024 Jun 21;6(3):93-106. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2023.0064. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Frailty as an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Direct Myocardial Revascularization.衰弱作为直接心肌血运重建患者不良结局的独立预测因素。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 3;14(13):1419. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131419.
5
Pre-operative anaemia-does it influence post-operative outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?术前贫血——它会影响单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后的术后结局吗?
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;40(4):410-418. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01746-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Frailty efficacy as a predictor of clinical and cognitive complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective cohort study.虚弱疗效作为预测行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者临床和认知并发症的指标:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03781-7.
7
Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Older Adults: Recent Advances and Gaps in Evidence.老年人心血管疾病的管理:最新进展与证据空白
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 11;12(16):5233. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165233.
8
Preoperative prediction of adverse outcome after elective gastrointestinal surgery in older patients: three leading frailty instruments and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status.老年患者择期胃肠手术后不良结局的术前预测:三种主要的衰弱评估工具与美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级
Am J Transl Res. 2023 May 15;15(5):3476-3488. eCollection 2023.
9
Association of preoperative clinical frailty and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.术前临床虚弱与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后老年稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者临床结局的相关性。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Oct;38(10):1205-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02276-3. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
How Can We Best Measure Frailty in Cardiosurgical Patients?我们如何才能最好地衡量心脏外科手术患者的虚弱程度?
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):3010. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083010.