PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
River Cities Clinical Research Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1195-1205. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx212.
To examine the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients by opioid class received.
Data were pooled from three phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: Adults with chronic noncancer pain receiving opioid therapy for 30 or more days and diagnosed with OIC.
Overall mean change from baseline in spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency, overall treatment response (≥1 SBM/week improvement over baseline SBM frequency in all treatment weeks with available data and ≥3 SBMs/week for ≥9 of the 12 weeks of treatment), and OIC-related symptoms were examined in patients taking opioids. Data were pooled and analyzed by opioid group.
In patients receiving phenanthrene opioids (e.g., oxycodone; N = 1,159), lubiprostone significantly increased overall mean changes in SBM frequency from baseline (P = 0.0001), increased overall response rate (P = 0.0024), and improved OIC symptoms (P ≤ 0.0229) vs placebo. Patients receiving phenylpiperidine opioids (e.g., fentanyl; N = 137) had significant improvement in SBM frequency (P = 0.0129) and favorable trends in response rates (21.4% vs 9.8%; P = 0.0723) and OIC symptoms vs placebo. Efficacy was not observed in overall analyses of patients receiving diphenylheptane opioids (e.g., methadone), although an increase in SBM frequency was observed in patients who received a morphine-equivalent daily dose of 200 or fewer mg, suggesting a dose-dependent negative interference of this opioid class on lubiprostone effects. For all groups, the lubiprostone adverse event profile was similar; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and diarrhea.
In patients using commonly prescribed opioids, lubiprostone is effective and generally well tolerated for the treatment of OIC.
研究比沙可啶治疗不同阿片类药物所致便秘(OIC)的疗效和安全性。
对三项 III 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的数据进行汇总。
对象/地点:慢性非癌痛患者,接受阿片类药物治疗 30 天以上且确诊为 OIC。
采用总体平均变化率(从基线至第 12 周,每周有效治疗的 SBM 次数至少增加 1 次,且至少有 9 周每周 SBM 次数至少增加 3 次,并且 SBM 频率从基线开始增加)评估接受阿片类药物治疗的患者的总体治疗反应(SBM 频率)、OIC 相关症状和总体治疗反应。汇总数据,并根据阿片类药物分组进行分析。
在接受菲类阿片类药物(如羟考酮;n=1159)治疗的患者中,比沙可啶可显著增加 SBM 频率的总体平均变化率(P=0.0001)、提高总体应答率(P=0.0024)、改善 OIC 症状(P≤0.0229),与安慰剂相比差异均有统计学意义。接受苯丙哌啶类阿片类药物(如芬太尼;n=137)治疗的患者 SBM 频率明显改善(P=0.0129),应答率(21.4% vs 9.8%;P=0.0723)和 OIC 症状的改善趋势有统计学意义,与安慰剂相比差异均有统计学意义。但在接受二苯庚烷类阿片类药物(如美沙酮)治疗的患者中,总体分析未观察到疗效,尽管接受 200mg 或以下吗啡等效日剂量的患者 SBM 频率增加,提示此类阿片类药物对比沙可啶疗效存在剂量依赖性的负面干扰。对于所有组,比沙可啶的不良反应谱相似,最常见的治疗中出现的不良反应是恶心和腹泻。
在使用常用阿片类药物的患者中,比沙可啶治疗 OIC 有效且通常耐受良好。