Suppr超能文献

几种适用于CAD-CAM整体修复体的牙科陶瓷的疲劳强度。

Fatigue strength of several dental ceramics indicated for CAD-CAM monolithic restorations.

作者信息

Nishioka Gabriela, Prochnow Catina, Firmino Aline, Amaral Marina, Bottino Marco Antonio, Valandro Luiz Felipe, Renata Marques de Melo

机构信息

Universidade Estadual Paulisa - Unesp, Faculty of Odontology, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Faculty of Odontology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2018 Jun 11;32:e53. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0053.

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the fatigue strength of different ceramic materials indicated for monolithic restorations. Disc-shaped specimens were made according to ISO 6872 from five different ceramic materials: feldspathic ceramic (FC), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PIC), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic (ZLS), and high translucent tetragonal zirconia polycrystals doped by yttrium (YZ-HT). After obtaining the mean of each material (n = 5) from monotonic load-to-failure tests, specimens (n = 20) were subjected to fatigue tests (staircase method) using a biaxial flexural setup (piston-on-three-balls), to determine the fatigue strength. The parameters used for fatigue tests were: 100,000 cycles at 10 Hz, initial load of ~ 60% of mean load-to-failure, and step size of 5% of the initial load (specific for each ceramic material). Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05) were used to analyze the fatigue strength data. Fatigue strength (MPa) of the materials was statistically different among each other as follows: YZ-HT (370.2 ± 38.7) > LD (175.2 ± 7.5) > ZLS (152.1 ± 7.5) > PIC (81.8 ± 3.9) > FC (50.8 ± 1.9). Thus, it can be concluded that, in terms of fatigue, high translucent polycrystalline zirconia is the best choice for monolithic restorations as it bears the highest load before cracking/fracturing.

摘要

这项体外研究评估了适用于整体修复的不同陶瓷材料的疲劳强度。根据ISO 6872标准,用五种不同的陶瓷材料制作了圆盘形试样:长石质陶瓷(FC)、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PIC)、二硅酸锂微晶玻璃(LD)、氧化锆增强二硅酸锂微晶玻璃(ZLS)和钇掺杂的高透 tetragonal氧化锆多晶体(YZ-HT)。在从单调加载至破坏试验中获得每种材料的平均值(n = 5)后,对试样(n = 20)使用双轴弯曲装置(三球上活塞法)进行疲劳试验(阶梯法),以确定疲劳强度。用于疲劳试验的参数为:10 Hz下100,000次循环,初始载荷约为平均破坏载荷的60%,步长为初始载荷的5%(每种陶瓷材料特定)。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Bonferroni检验(α = 0.05)分析疲劳强度数据。材料的疲劳强度(MPa)在彼此之间存在统计学差异,如下所示:YZ-HT(370.2 ± 38.7)> LD(175.2 ± 7.5)> ZLS(152.1 ± 7.5)> PIC(81.8 ± 3.9)> FC(50.8 ± 1.9)。因此,可以得出结论,就疲劳而言,高透多晶氧化锆是整体修复的最佳选择,因为它在开裂/断裂前承受的载荷最高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验