• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃离子水门汀可用于癌症放射治疗后正畸托槽的粘结吗?

Glass Ionomer Cements can be used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets After Cancer Radiation Treatment?

作者信息

Santin Gabriela Cristina, Queiroz Alexandra Mussolino de, Palma-Dibb Regina Guenka, Oliveira Harley Francisco de, Nelson Filho Paulo, Romano Fábio Lourenço

机构信息

Department of Dentistry , UEM- Universidade Estadual de Maringá , Maringá, PR, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, UNINGÁ - Centro Universitário Ingá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):128-132. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801436.

DOI:10.1590/0103-6440201801436
PMID:29898057
Abstract

Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment present more susceptibility to dental caries and the use of an orthodontic device increases this risk factor due to biofilm accumulation around the brackets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to irradiated permanent teeth of orthodontic brackets bonded with conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement due to the fluoride release capacity of these materials. Ninety prepared human premolars were divided into 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding material and use or not of radiation: CR: Transbond XT composite resin; RMGIC: Fuji Ortho LC conventional glass ionomer cement; GIC: Ketac Cem Easymix resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The groups were irradiated (I) or non-irradiated (NI) prior to bracket bonding. The specimens were subjected to a fractioned radiation dose of 2 Gy over 5 consecutive days for 6 weeks. After the radiotherapy, the brackets were bonded on the specimens with Transbond XT, Fuji Ortho LC and Ketac Cem Easymix. After 24 h, the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test. The image of enamel surface (classified by Adhesive Remnant Index - ARI) was also evaluated and its frequency was checked among groups/subgroups. The shear bond strength variable was evaluated with ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. GIC group showed the lowest adhesion values among the groups (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among non-irradiated and irradiated groups (p>0.05). As for the ARI, the CR-I group showed the highest material retention on enamel surface among the irradiated groups. RMGIC group showed the highest values for shear bond strength and presented ARI acceptable for clinical practices.

摘要

接受放射治疗的患者更容易患龋齿,而使用正畸装置会因托槽周围生物膜的积聚增加这种风险因素。本研究的目的是评估由于这些材料的氟释放能力,用传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的正畸托槽与照射后的恒牙之间的剪切粘结强度。根据粘结材料以及是否进行放射治疗,将90颗制备好的人类前磨牙分为6组(n = 15):CR组:Transbond XT复合树脂;RMGIC组:Fuji Ortho LC传统玻璃离子水门汀;GIC组:Ketac Cem Easymix树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀。在粘结托槽之前,对这些组进行照射(I)或未照射(NI)。对标本连续5天每天给予2 Gy的分次辐射剂量,持续6周。放射治疗后,用Transbond XT、Fuji Ortho LC和Ketac Cem Easymix将托槽粘结在标本上。24小时后,对标本进行剪切粘结强度测试。还评估了釉质表面的图像(根据粘结剂残留指数 - ARI分类),并检查了各组/亚组之间的频率。用方差分析和Tukey事后检验评估剪切粘结强度变量。GIC组在各组中显示出最低的粘结值(p<0.05)。未照射组和照射组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。至于ARI,CR-I组在照射组中显示出在釉质表面的材料保留率最高。RMGIC组显示出最高的剪切粘结强度值,并且呈现出临床实践可接受的ARI。

相似文献

1
Glass Ionomer Cements can be used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets After Cancer Radiation Treatment?玻璃离子水门汀可用于癌症放射治疗后正畸托槽的粘结吗?
Braz Dent J. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):128-132. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801436.
2
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
3
Effects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.釉质脱矿对传统玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀粘结托槽的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Aug;35(4):442-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs006. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
4
Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.传统树脂黏合剂与树脂改性玻璃离子黏合剂之间黏结强度的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Aug;126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.013.
5
The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.表面处理对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41(3):201-7. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000097.
6
In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.用于粘结正畸托槽的三种树脂玻璃离子水门汀24小时和30天剪切粘结强度的体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):620-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70221-5.
7
An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与复合粘结剂用于粘结正畸托槽的抗剪切粘结强度的体外比较
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Oct;27(5):477-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji051. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
8
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.光固化填充封闭剂对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024.
9
Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.使用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和含氟树脂复合材料粘结的正畸托槽周围的脱矿情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 May-Jun;23(3):255-9.
10
Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.用于正畸粘结的一种复合体和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的实验室评估。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):58-63; discussion 64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0058:LEOACA>2.3.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Irradiation on the Adhesive Performance of Resin-Based Dental Biomaterials: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.辐照对树脂基牙科生物材料粘结性能的影响:实验室研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;16(7):2580. doi: 10.3390/ma16072580.