Suppr超能文献

22 至 25 孕周胎儿死亡分类的国际比较。

An International Comparison of Death Classification at 22 to 25 Weeks' Gestational Age.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2018 Jul;142(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3324. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore international differences in the classification of births at extremely low gestation and the subsequent impact on the calculation of survival rates.

METHODS

We used national data on births at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation from the United States (2014; = 11 144), Canada (2009-2014; = 5668), the United Kingdom (2014-2015; = 2992), Norway (2010-2014; = 409), Finland (2010-2015; = 348), Sweden (2011-2014; = 489), and Japan (2014-2015; = 2288) to compare neonatal survival rates using different denominators: all births, births alive at the onset of labor, live births, live births surviving to 1 hour, and live births surviving to 24 hours.

RESULTS

For births at 22 weeks' gestation, neonatal survival rates for which we used live births as the denominator varied from 3.7% to 56.7% among the 7 countries. This variation decreased when the denominator was changed to include stillbirths (ie, all births [1.8%-22.3%] and fetuses alive at the onset of labor [3.7%-38.2%]) or exclude early deaths and limited to births surviving at least 12 hours (50.0%-77.8%). Similar trends were seen for infants born at 23 weeks' gestation. Variation diminished considerably at 24 and 25 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

International variation in neonatal survival rates at 22 to 23 weeks' gestation diminished considerably when including stillbirths in the denominator, revealing the variation arises in part from differences in the proportion of births reported as live births, which itself is closely connected to the provision of active care.

摘要

目的

探讨极低胎龄分娩分类的国际差异及其对生存率计算的后续影响。

方法

我们使用了美国(2014 年;n=11444)、加拿大(2009-2014 年;n=5668)、英国(2014-2015 年;n=2992)、挪威(2010-2014 年;n=409)、芬兰(2010-2015 年;n=348)、瑞典(2011-2014 年;n=489)和日本(2014-2015 年;n=2288)22-25 孕周分娩的国家数据,比较了使用不同分母的新生儿生存率:所有分娩、临产时存活的分娩、活产、存活至 1 小时的活产和存活至 24 小时的活产。

结果

在 22 孕周分娩中,7 个国家使用活产作为分母的新生儿生存率从 3.7%到 56.7%不等。当分母改为包括死产时(即所有分娩[1.8%-22.3%]和临产时存活的胎儿[3.7%-38.2%])或排除早期死亡并仅限于至少存活 12 小时的分娩时(50.0%-77.8%),这种差异会减小。在 23 孕周分娩的婴儿中也出现了类似的趋势。在 24 周和 25 周时,差异明显减少。

结论

在将死产纳入分母时,22-23 孕周新生儿生存率的国际差异显著减小,这表明差异部分源于活产报告比例的差异,而活产报告比例本身与积极护理的提供密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验